mrpotatohead
ArboristSite Member
Completely agree, when I used to cut a lot, I kept that in mind when buying, but I took a break, came back,
and people were all into HP, when KW would have been better, and Torque figures better still.
For cookie cutters, speed is what matters most, for real work its Torque, a saw needs torque to start up again
in the cut, as when we stop to hammer in a wedge, and start again.
The EPA and the EU have caused the characteristics of the saw to change, a lot of carbs are designed
to only apply enough fuel at high rpm, this is because the engine is more efficient at burning when
a bigger charge of fuel and oxygen is present, this happen at higher rpm 's, thus the modern saws
suffer in the lower range just to keep the EPA and EU happy.
Certain carbs help this, but if the saw is not designed with Torque in mind as opposed to speed, there
really is nothing you can do. That Makita the OP got is good in this respect.
I want to like your message cause I agree, but it's hard to like something containing a message of truth that has created a negative effect on our beloved tools/equipment. It would be interesting to see what we could purchase today if all the money and time spent on emission compliance was spent on simply a better product. I dare say we would be seeing a new generation of chain/bars out there to accommodate the power of "modern saws," had the industry been able to focus merely on product improvement.