Actually I don't doubt that the 7900 will beat a 385. In big wood though my Husky 281XP with a 7pin sprocket is about as fast as the 7900with an 8 pin. In smaller stuff the 7900 beats it. This is NOT in any way a criticism of the 7900 just an observation about gearing.
ROLLACOSTA said:sorry no pdf or picture ,but i will post some tommorow when i get the saw,i guess this is a veRy new/latest saw,this saw is more exspensive than the 6400..but i want a very light everyday saw..
but for now heres the speck sheet
engine 2 stroke
cubic capacity 50cc
bar size 45 cm
horsepower 3.8hp [din]
chain type 686/.325'' full chisel
chain gauge 1.5mm
tank capacity 0.47 litre
Ignition electic
power rateing 2,800w
net weight 5.1kg
has some other stuff /gumpf
ultra low vibration 4.7m/sec2
what i cant work out is what the heck does the ' i ' in 5200i mean or stand
for ,just one other note the 5000 has more power out put than the 520 and the 5200i which are both 52 cc models ...are i just read the 5200i is 2 STROKE INJECTED
US EPA
...like I said in a previous thread, we keep electing the clowns that stuff this type of narrow minded nonsense down our throats to "save" us from ourselves. Kinda like a company I used to work for that would continually spend a dollar to save a few pennies. I chalk it up to some folks just having too much time on their hands. That and they have to justify their existence and their paychecks. Do I sound cynical? When it comes to this stuff, yup, I am.Stumper said:This is typical U.S bureaucratic thinking-bureaucrats want to criticize the percentage of unburned hydrocarbons coming out while ignoring the total volume. Put a "smog pump" on a truck and cause it to use twice as much fuel and emit more noxious gas but the percentages of various exhaust components are now "acceptable"
