I had an offer of a free scroll saw (from a guy who bought one and used it for a few weeks and the moved on to some other hobby) but there is unfortunately no where I can squeeze it into my shed. A couple of weeks back I managed to shoehorn a metal working lathe onto the drive way and covered it up with a sheet of plastic but SWMBO found it and I got the dagger looks again!
Yeah I guess scroll saw work needs a scroll saw, just like pen makers and turners need a lathe of some kind so different folks will need different machines but what I see is nearly all of them can make a lot of use of a bandsaw.
Not really my kind of thing but I can still see the effort and craftsmanship in your work there TJB! and BTW welcome aboard the milling fun house
I checked out your cool website and I really like your CS carriage mill - I can see lots of craftsmanship there to. Unfortunately I don't have room for a carriage mill at my place but I can see some ideas in your set up that may even be useful on an alaskan mill.
I also saw on your website that you found 0.035" raker depths helped you cut faster. If you learn about progressive raker depths you'll find that fixed raker depths ) whether they're 0.025" or 0.030" or 0.035) are not the most efficient method for cutting thru the whole life of the chain. The most efficient raker depth will change constantly and substantially during the life of the chain. When the chain is new a raker depth of 0.025" will work fine but as the cutter wears, the depth needs to be increased even more, some of my chains are now running rakers of 0.045". What should not change is the cutting angle (not the same as top plate filing angle)
This can be achieved to some extent by using a Carlton File-O-Plate (FOP). There is a geeky discussion about the effectiveness of FOPs and "Cutting angle" in the chainsaw forum sticky http://www.arboristsite.com/showthread.php?t=114624
Yeah I guess scroll saw work needs a scroll saw, just like pen makers and turners need a lathe of some kind so different folks will need different machines but what I see is nearly all of them can make a lot of use of a bandsaw.
. . . . .Here's a few pics of the stuff I do and a link to my website if you want to see my CSM
Not really my kind of thing but I can still see the effort and craftsmanship in your work there TJB! and BTW welcome aboard the milling fun house
I checked out your cool website and I really like your CS carriage mill - I can see lots of craftsmanship there to. Unfortunately I don't have room for a carriage mill at my place but I can see some ideas in your set up that may even be useful on an alaskan mill.
I also saw on your website that you found 0.035" raker depths helped you cut faster. If you learn about progressive raker depths you'll find that fixed raker depths ) whether they're 0.025" or 0.030" or 0.035) are not the most efficient method for cutting thru the whole life of the chain. The most efficient raker depth will change constantly and substantially during the life of the chain. When the chain is new a raker depth of 0.025" will work fine but as the cutter wears, the depth needs to be increased even more, some of my chains are now running rakers of 0.045". What should not change is the cutting angle (not the same as top plate filing angle)
This can be achieved to some extent by using a Carlton File-O-Plate (FOP). There is a geeky discussion about the effectiveness of FOPs and "Cutting angle" in the chainsaw forum sticky http://www.arboristsite.com/showthread.php?t=114624