Mark, from what I've seen (limited experience, I'm most certainly no expert) at one time Poulan & Remington were ahead of the game when it came to 'compact' saws with good power-to-weight ratios. Remington unfortunately had some of the crappiest paint jobs ever used on a chainsaw, and I'm convinced that had a lot to do with the demise of Remington chainsaws. What makes their crappy paint jobs unfathomable is DuPont, which apparantly made some great paint, owned Remington.
I don't how Remington saws perform going head-to-head against similar Poulan models, but it sure would make for some interesting comparisons. Maybe Carl will post his thoughts, I know that he has a large collection of Remingtons and more than a few Poulans.
Chris, I'm no expert on Remington's either. They were never popular around here back in there heyday as far as I remember. With that said I won't get in to direct comparisons either.
I do have a few impressions on the few Remington's that I have a bit of experience with. I don't care for the Mity Mite saws much at all, the older mag saws or the even worse later plastic cased versions. Poulan would win that comparison every day of the week and twice on Sunday and that's just comparing them to the Poulan micro based saws.
Some of the other later and larger saws were probably fine but I just can't see a quality saw using a pressured oiling system on them. They even used that system on the larger saws like the SL-7 which was one of the top of the line pro logger saws.
I can see that system used on something like the $79 Micro or a Mity Mite, but that's about it.
So I'll just leave it at that for now, I never really learned Remington history and such like I would like to.