I was thinking the same thing earlier today.I have been lucky and had the opportunity to run both. Don't own either though.
The 7700 seems to be a rare bird. I actually ran a 7700 & 8500 back to back several times. I was shocked and kinda leaning towards the 7700 as the better saw.
Maybe better is the wrong word. Just seemed real close, and maybe smoother, if thats possible. Like maybe 77cc is the "sweet spot" for that particular series of saws. But, I would gladly have either...LOL I never run a 6900 though.
A newer version of the 4200. I ran a 4900 once at our GTG, but I think that one was (modified in some way) don't remember. Maybe had a 85cc top end on it???
Gregg,
Meh it's a micro. I know you like them! Actually I just built a pretty descent one but it will be sent down the lineif you click on the pic it makes it full size i made it thumbnail size View attachment 413091 View attachment 413092 View attachment 413093
i see a score in the cylinder on the back side also.....the rings dont look right either.... glad i looked inside it.....i do this on every saw soon as i get it.....it was not that much only 50 shipped but was supposed to be mint... a shelf queen,,,,I never sell a saw with out looking at the piston....if i do i say this is for parts.... and it came from a very knowledgeable person.....not joe blow down the block that holds it up by the string.......not sure what i want to do i can swap parts i have them..... But thats really not the point..... Thanks jerry i was looking for opinions.....i think i could maybe clean it up and buy new rings etc..... but that's alot of Bs to go through......it is cosmetically mint....i guess its good to sit on the shelf LMAo....the piston is covered in oil cant figure out why it would score air leak maybe????
I agree. At least they made the 60cc saws on that platform. Hard to beatWell, Here is a time killer post, brought on by boredom and too much coffee this morning.
What saw would have liked to see Poulan make, that they did not? Or, wished they would have made, is probably a better way to put it.
I have always said I wished they had made a 70cc version of the PP380/3750 etc. The more I got to thinking about it, would have been nice to have a 70cc & a larger 85/90cc version also. But, they would probably had to make them on a slightly larger platform I suppose. To handle the larger bars that would likely be used with them. Still, I think would have been a great series of saws. (similar to the 372xp & 385/390xp Husky saws)
Who knows what might have been, before all the buyouts, takeovers, etc. And, Poulan was still a separate company, on its own, so to speak. They no doubt would have ended the big reed valve saw line. Like the 7700/8500. But would be interesting to think what they might have replaced them with. We will never know, but its fun to dream a little..
Gregg,
Meh it's a micro. I know you like them! Actually I just built a pretty descent one but it will be sent down the line
Sound like the description was less than honest. I might have a donor saw. Also have an NIB micro on my shelf
I think I got rid of most of my micro stuff. But I know I have at least 2 saws and some partsI have to say you were very accurate on your saws that i bought.... one you said had a light score i had to get my magnifying glass to find it LOL.....i always look at the piston now ....learned that the hard way.... wish ya could check seals as easy LOL.....
if you click on the pic it makes it full size i made it thumbnail size View attachment 413091 View attachment 413092 View attachment 413093
Well, Here is a time killer post, brought on by boredom and too much coffee this morning.
What saw would have liked to see Poulan make, that they did not? Or, wished they would have made, is probably a better way to put it.
I have always said I wished they had made a 70cc version of the PP380/3750 etc. The more I got to thinking about it, would have been nice to have a 70cc & a larger 85/90cc version also. But, they would probably had to make them on a slightly larger platform I suppose. To handle the larger bars that would likely be used with them. Still, I think would have been a great series of saws. (similar to the 372xp & 385/390xp Husky saws)
Who knows what might have been, before all the buyouts, takeovers, etc. And, Poulan was still a separate company, on its own, so to speak. They no doubt would have ended the big reed valve saw line. Like the 7700/8500. But would be interesting to think what they might have replaced them with. We will never know, but its fun to dream a little..
Gregg,
if you click on the pic it makes it full size i made it thumbnail size View attachment 413091 View attachment 413092 View attachment 413093
I was thinking the same thing earlier today.I have been lucky and had the opportunity to run both. Don't own either though.
The 7700 seems to be a rare bird. I actually ran a 7700 & 8500 back to back several times. I was shocked and kinda leaning towards the 7700 as the better saw.
Maybe better is the wrong word. Just seemed real close, and maybe smoother, if thats possible. Like maybe 77cc is the "sweet spot" for that particular series of saws. But, I would gladly have either...LOL I never run a 6900 though.
A newer version of the 4200. I ran a 4900 once at our GTG, but I think that one was (modified in some way) don't remember. Maybe had a 85cc top end on it???
Gregg,
I had to use a cylinder gasket on mine so it would pull easier. Even with the gasket its in the area of 160. Without one it was a bearany idea what the compression of a pp475 is supposed to be? I broke my starter rope when it poped. Good thing, I may have lost some fingers.
You ran my 4900 I think. Its stock and 77cc just like the 7700 is.
I don't know which one is meaner my 044 or the 475.
Gregg mentioned he was disappointed he didn't see a moose when he came to Canada.
They run as good as a Poulan. You don't get in their way.
http://i.imgur.com/aj4iuMB.gifv