Reading through the "how to choose a stove" article on another site i ran across a confusing comment about the cat vs non-cat comparison that I need some clarification on.
The article states the non-cat need to have a very insulated firebox to achieve a temperature high enough to achieve the secondary burn required to meet EPA regulations.
With no experience in the stove world this suggests to me that the firebox insulation would prevent the heat from reaching it's target, the outside environment the stove sits in? I also gathered that the cat stoves did not require that amount of insulation because the cat dropped the temps required for re-burn. If this is the case, it leads me to believe that the cat stoves by design would offer more usable heat because of the lack of insulation. Are my assumptions off base?
The article states the non-cat need to have a very insulated firebox to achieve a temperature high enough to achieve the secondary burn required to meet EPA regulations.
With no experience in the stove world this suggests to me that the firebox insulation would prevent the heat from reaching it's target, the outside environment the stove sits in? I also gathered that the cat stoves did not require that amount of insulation because the cat dropped the temps required for re-burn. If this is the case, it leads me to believe that the cat stoves by design would offer more usable heat because of the lack of insulation. Are my assumptions off base?