I’ve been trying to look around and do some research and haven’t come up with a straightforward answer about this so I’m putting it out for the pros.
I’ve noticed on most open port cylinders there is a middle vane or blade if you will that runs the length of the transfers. When putting the cylinder for performance purposes, is there any value in grinding out that middle vane?
For example, on an MS 290 or 390 where that middle blade is really thick. Cannot be thinned or just removed all together?
I started playing around with a cheap little Warhawk cylinder for an ms180 and I noticed the blade was rather thin and tapered once it reached the upper transfer are. I’ve attached a picture of the 180 cylinder
You will see where I started to widen the lower transfer a bit but then I decided to pause and run this question by the forum before I took any more material out
I’ve noticed on most open port cylinders there is a middle vane or blade if you will that runs the length of the transfers. When putting the cylinder for performance purposes, is there any value in grinding out that middle vane?
For example, on an MS 290 or 390 where that middle blade is really thick. Cannot be thinned or just removed all together?
I started playing around with a cheap little Warhawk cylinder for an ms180 and I noticed the blade was rather thin and tapered once it reached the upper transfer are. I’ve attached a picture of the 180 cylinder
You will see where I started to widen the lower transfer a bit but then I decided to pause and run this question by the forum before I took any more material out