Lot of good stand management suggestions in these threads.
I'd like to ask a three part question on treating slash in hardwood or coniferous forests. Leaving slash as cut; mechanical or hand piling slash; mechanical chipping of slash (delimber or tub grinding); burn slash in piles.
1. Skip block clear cutting for lumber/pulp.
2. Pre-commercial thinning for later years lumber harvest.
3. Selective cut for lumber/pulp.
What is the preferred treatment for fire management, wildlife support, forest health, regeneration ?
Kind of a wide question, but some practical observations/experience would be appreciated.
This gets complex. Up Nort in Wisconsin, the fire season in the hardwoods wasn't very long. It was after snowmelt, before green up and just after the leaves had fallen, Fall. The slash was usually run over during the forwarding so that was the treatment. In the pines, there was controversy brewing. The fuels expert had started doing underburns, but the timber folks were concerned about charring. The paper companies did not want charred wood.
That's something to be concerned about.
Out here, we've gone 180 from what it used to be. We're kind of an asbestos forest. We have fire danger for a few weeks in August when the east winds blow. Historically, the big fires have been few, but severe and erupt during those windy times. So, (I'm talking thinnings here) we just burn the slash that has accumulated on the landings and also have it hand piled and burned along the busier roads. Slash returns nutrients to the soils and also works well for erosion control. It is hard to burn anymore with all the air pollution regulation. Some of the private and state lands still try to burn after clearcutting. Sometimes they don't burn, but lop the slash so it lies closer to the ground, and that will keep flame lengths low if a fire should get started there. Slash makes for harder planting.
So, there really is no preferred method. Once again it depends on the outcome. Some brush species that deer like will respond better after a burn.
Brush species that humans use for basket weaving and berries (huckleberries, yummmm) will get more vigorous after a burn goes through. Historically, the Indians burned the higher elevations around here to keep the huckleberries going. The cons of burning are air pollution, the chance of the fire escaping, scorching and charring the leave trees. For lumber, the charring isn't such a big deal but it also makes for scars on the tree which affects grade and defect.
You can do an underburn in a thinning or partial cut if conditions are right and you have a crew that will control themselves, AND tree species that can take it.
Burning is one big complex thing if you want to do it right.