If the intake and exhaust aren't widened, it's not a woods port, IMHO.
I here you, it will be done soon.
If the intake and exhaust aren't widened, it's not a woods port, IMHO.
I here you, it will be done soon.
Did you resolve you squish questions?
I here you, it will be done soon.
Hey, ya know we are here to help. Whatever it is just ask.
I appreciate that. And I will.
What is a woods port? Maybe it would help all of those following this thread to define it.
Alright guys I have some questions for you. Is a squish of .020 inches too narrow? Are any gains made by smoothing the edges in the crank area where the 2 sides meet?
.020 is good, that's what I shoot for in all my saws. I wouldn't touch the case's.
Sounds like casting flaws, I'd clean them up.
Fast on the draw we are lol.
Thats what I thought but they are perfectly spaced 2 on the top and 2 on the bottom.
Thats what I thought but they are perfectly spaced 2 on the top and 2 on the bottom.
Alright thanks for all the info so far. On the intake is it good to widen it on the carb side to match the piston side? Or do you go further?
I don't do it since its already well matched to the size of the rubber intake boot.
So just knock off the casting flaws and move on to the exaust port?
Enter your email address to join: