B_Turner
Addicted to ArboristSite
I am kind of beating this topic to death, but....
Of the liger mods I have seen, everyone (including me) has run the biggest hole forward as a connection point.
If a person did not care about having an extra large hole on their rope bridge connection plate (like the ergo, for example), I think it might make more sense to reverse the plate and put both the upper and leg straps through the big hole (which would then be toward the back/outside).
This is how all stock saddle plates I have seen are. Again, look at the buckinghams.
It would help the one very minor issue my liger setup has, which is the rope kind of pulls the plate "inside out" because the rope bridge hole is further to the outside than the connecting straps holes.
No biggie, but kind of inelegant. I think reversing the plate orientation would have the rope pulling from inside the connection strap so the plate would not flip over....
Anyone tried this orientation with the straps both through the biggest hole in the plate?
Of the liger mods I have seen, everyone (including me) has run the biggest hole forward as a connection point.
If a person did not care about having an extra large hole on their rope bridge connection plate (like the ergo, for example), I think it might make more sense to reverse the plate and put both the upper and leg straps through the big hole (which would then be toward the back/outside).
This is how all stock saddle plates I have seen are. Again, look at the buckinghams.
It would help the one very minor issue my liger setup has, which is the rope kind of pulls the plate "inside out" because the rope bridge hole is further to the outside than the connecting straps holes.
No biggie, but kind of inelegant. I think reversing the plate orientation would have the rope pulling from inside the connection strap so the plate would not flip over....
Anyone tried this orientation with the straps both through the biggest hole in the plate?
Last edited: