Guy Meilleur
Addicted to ArboristSite
From another thread: "I do my analysis on "crowding trees" on owners age, my reason being *why remove a 80 yr olds tree when a lite prune will see his days out* with the tree, in a crowding situation."
This makes a lot of sense to me. If our role is to facilitate the coexistence of people and trees, why not keep even a terminally ill tree around, when it will likely outlast the owner? Thinning a stand anticipates the process of nature, but no need to rush it too much. The pace is determined by client, biology, budget, etc.
After all, every tree we see will someday be compost. As long as it is useful and safe, why not keep it around, even the ones that are not in a "crowding situation"? (Lopa, why not retain trees in a non-thinning situation? What's different there?)
This makes a lot of sense to me. If our role is to facilitate the coexistence of people and trees, why not keep even a terminally ill tree around, when it will likely outlast the owner? Thinning a stand anticipates the process of nature, but no need to rush it too much. The pace is determined by client, biology, budget, etc.
After all, every tree we see will someday be compost. As long as it is useful and safe, why not keep it around, even the ones that are not in a "crowding situation"? (Lopa, why not retain trees in a non-thinning situation? What's different there?)