In my opinion (and I might be wrong) present modern saws will be unmaintainable when they become classic - most already will have been replaced by then, and parts for individual survivors won't be readily available.
Dead stock of old McCulloch parts pops up here even now. And those parts still can be used since they were made to last as things were repaired rather than replaced in the old days (last century).
In recent years the model life span has shortened over all and parts inventory management has improved, and the parts' shelf life (quality) has decreased accordingly. Also, since saws have become ever cheaper the number of repairs (and parts needed) has decreased. The repair-friendly days are over.
To maintain classic saws in the future it may be a good idea to preserve the parts needed first (now)...
If we're strictly comparing to battery powered, the list of acceptable alternatives is long, and come in all colors. I could possibly even be talked into a Holzfforma in that scenario.I think this is an interesting angle, and planned obsolescence is definitely a part of today's products. The question is, when the EPA outlaws 2 strokes entirely (and it's absolutely going to happen), which of today's saws would you rather have on hand than the battery powered saws that will fill their space?
I would prefer any older saw over whatever is available today where maintaining the tool as a classic is concerned. I have revived saws from the 60ies 10-15 years ago that just needed a carb cleaning and fuel line/filter replacement and they still run now, and some of those really have seen some (ab)use. Engines made after 1990 and especially at present contain parts that are possibly easier and cheaper to produce but also will very definitely fail (are meant to fail) in the (not so) long run. Money wasted if you already have a saw that works and can be made to work again and again if it fails.I think this is an interesting angle, and planned obsolescence is definitely a part of today's products. The question is, when the EPA outlaws 2 strokes entirely (and it's absolutely going to happen), which of today's saws would you rather have on hand than the battery powered saws that will fill their space?
No doubt! How many batteries would it take to replace my 066 magnum and 1 gallon of premix? I'm assuming more than i can carry.If we're strictly comparing to battery powered, the list of acceptable alternatives is long, and come in all colors. I could possibly even be talked into a Holzfforma in that scenario.
I don't know that I'd buy a second one just to keep in a box, but every chainsaw connoisseur should have one.
View attachment 716491
It is more in the class of the Stihl 150t. Husqvarna also has a similar offering on their website now due to become available soon.Is this top handle known as being special? How does it compare to the well loved Stihl 201t?
It might.I’m kinda hoping th 346XPNE makes the list one of these years.
Wouldn’t be bothered if the MS261 std carb makes the list either.
.
200T is a given.i think stihl ms200t, 361, 381, 660 and husky 346/353, 61, 372xp oe, 288, 395, 3120 deserved to be mentioned
if most could go back in time! 55 chevy,67 Camaro,64.5 mustang ,52 chevy truck etc.,etc.Funny, but the point of my post wasn't for "investment" purposes, or as a money maker. The point is to buy for personal use now while these saws are available, and have them for the future. Whether they go up in value or not is a secondary item. For me, its a matter of regret. If you have the money now, and you're not looking at it as an investment or cash flow generator, why not buy the saws you think are at the top of their game, and might not ever be sold new again?
So to that end, what are the best of the best saws available today that might not be equaled or surpassed by the saws of the future?
426 Hemi Cuda!if most could go back in time! 55 chevy,67 Camaro,64.5 mustang ,52 chevy truck etc.,etc.
426 Hemi Cuda!
Enter your email address to join: