To be honest I never tried a maloff, all I tried is the granberg and the oregon ripping, which is a normal chain sharpened to 10°
The oregon was faster but it bogged the saw and the finish did not compare to Granberg. . . .
The top plate filing angle (TPFA) has very little to do with a saw bogging down. If anything a smaller TPFA should reduce the chances of a saw bogging down.
The two angles on cutters that can bog a saw are the top plate cutting angle and the raker-cutter-wood angle with the latter being the most significant
Barring something like a bent cutter I'm increasingly coming around to thinking the quality of the finish is largely dependent on the saw/mill moving smoothly down the log.
This means the operator or gravity or a winch being able to;
- the operator or gravity or a winch applying a steady forward pressure on mill - this is why gravity is potentially better force applicator than an operator or using a winch since the downward force of gravity in one place is constant.
- keeping the saw at constant RPM - not repeatedly pushing so as to repeatedly bog the saw
- not seesawing the mill down the log.
- using log rails for every cut, any roughness in finish produced from one cut can become magnified in a subsequent cut if the mill rails have to pass over that roughness.
I can get the same very good finish on 35º TPFA as with 10º TPFA but I have to be much more careful about how I move the mill down the log with the 35º TPFA chain. Seesawing with 35º TPA can really mess up a finish.
The other time one can run into problems with finish is when the width of the cut somehow synchronizes with the speed of the cut.
This photo show cuts made by the same mill, same chain (but with 2 stroke file touchup), same wood - but log in picture on right is about 30% wider.
The finish on the right is my standard finish 10º TPA full comp chain.