arbor pro, who did your seminar? I am curious because much of that is opposite of what we have been hearning from the Forest Service, Michigan State and Ohio State for several years. Not doubting your relaying what you heard...but more wondering about who told it to you...
1) Of course EAB treatment is not effective until EAB arrives, because there is no EAB to be effective against. Actually, most research is showing that your best chance of saving trees is to have the treatment in place when EAB shows up.
2) As for treatments only prolonging the life because they become less effective against adults: adults are not a problem, so treatments don't need to be effective against adults. If treatments become less effective, it is because you are not killing enough larvae, and the larvae that live damage the vascular system making next year's treatment less able to translocate, meaning more larvae are left alive (and feeding) leading to more damage to the vascular system... It is impossible to say what can/will happen in the long-term because we have only known about this bug for 7 years - but there are plenty of trees that have been effectively treated and are still doing well i nheavily infested areas.
3) EAB is an excellent flier (like many Agrilus spp.). Last I heard, they flew 6 miles when forced in a lab to fly to exhaustion... Of course, that does not mean they will set course and fly 6 miles straight down the road--but it doesn't account for wind either.
HOWEVER...both sets of information agree: Bad news for communities with lots of ash, and don't plant it.