Should Oakwilt be banned?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Should Oakwilt be banned

  • Get rid on the tinfoil hat wearing, ufo watching, backstepping, mental case.

    Votes: 8 22.9%
  • No, don't get rid of him, just get him help and medication.

    Votes: 27 77.1%

  • Total voters
    35
Originally posted by Mike Maas
it is well known around arboristsite that only i am allowed to make a complete ass of myself by writing totally stupid, indefensable things and then arguing them to the end.
If its my unofficial positition of arboristsite knob.......

Now wait a minute here Mike; i'd like to be at least in the running on that one!
 
Not a chance KC. Mike is the champ. He is unbeatable. Don't even try. :p

Xander, May I suggest that you delete this thread?:angel:
 
Originally posted by tomreeve
Shouldn't this be an off topic thread?
tom

Yep I say we get rid of all the forums and lets just have a lunch box forum and we can all just say what we want and nobody has to think before we post.
In fact we can be as low on the evolutionary scale as we want.
We may as well be like the public thinks of us!
A bunch of good ole boys who don't know there arse from a hole in the ground!:(
 
I have no problem with people having a view different than mine. I do not doubt Reeds ability and experience in tree care (his military stories are another subject). However, lately he has chosen not to expound on his tree knowledge but instead to be controversial. I am not saying I am lilly white. I have noticed a lot of references to what OW has contributed in the past. What about recently? I'm wondering if I'm developing an unfair bias towards OW. By responding the other members are allowing me to see other perspectives and I don't think that's all bad. The thread is helpful when viewed through my filter. Maybe I'm being selfish.......Naaaah.
 
Whatever Xander.

Wish you could've enjoyed the sunset here, first late Summer actic front came through and that'll happen no matter what you or I think. Though I tend to believe it's more beautiful in my ideal world than yours.

Just chill buddy, granite and magma will outlive us all. So too hopefully will a few trees.
 
Maybe I'm being selfish.......Naaaah.

Selfish is not the word. ???? is the word.

I read this 'suggestion' this morning, I didn't have time to reply...but it left a very bad feeling.

KC mentioned 'book burning' and that's one of the things that came to mind. "If I don't like it (or believe it) it's GOT to be wrong....and wrong for EVERYONE."

I had to wonder if I was in the right place anymore. Thankfully....the other members' responses backed me up that I was. :heart:
 
I guess I missed it...


is this the site version of "Survivor"?



Sure oak is both wrong and a PITA 90 percent of the time.

But... he has as much freedom to express his views on here as anyone.
 
So why was Rocky banned? Why Fales? There's some book burning for ya. I knew we'd finally get here.

All the name callers I'm talking to you!

Now I'm bad for trying to be democratic in my decision making?
 
"democratic" Xander?

When you limit the issues to vote on to the choices you presented that's about as democratic as asking Congress and the nation to approve a war action after giving them only false information.

Again, relax a bit...take some breaths, losing your cool is failure number one in surviving a condition red. You did carry that log didn't you..or not?

Maybe stay away from the newspapers or t.v. for a few days. Climb man, or haul. Aside from standing in the surf, up a tree is about as therapeutic as one can get. I did it today and look how mellow I'm being!

Again, relax. We can spar later.
 
Fales??? missed that one

Rocky had to go to the silent room for two weeks for using rotten nasty words that polite people don't use.

X---you're way off base here. Oh, "here" seems to not be the OT forum too.

I'll share a story that I've written before. A few years ago there was, and this is true, not made up, a talk show host called Turi Ryder on AM1500 in Minneapolis. She had a sharp tongue and was quite entertaing, to me anyway. Regularly, people would call in and try to berate her. She would stop them and share a service that she and her producer provided. For ten dollars they would get the callers address, come out to their house, find the radio...AND TURN IT OFF!!! If you don't like what Reed is saying, why do you read?

Shel Silversteen wrote, "Freakin' at the Freakers Ball." This is part:

"The greatest of the sadists and the masochists too,

Screaming! "I'll hit you if you hit me!"

You're setting yourself up as too big a target for comparison to totalitarian government. I'll let that one go...

Wasn't our country founded on some principles of acceptance and controversy? Why are you thinking that you're the one to champion behavior?

Tom

Tom
 
I dunno...

But if anyone is using ME as their moral barometer, we're all screwed.

:laugh:
 
Originally posted by Tom Dunlap
Fales??? missed that one

Rocky had to go to the silent room for two weeks for using rotten nasty words that polite people don't use.

Tom

LMAO rotten nasty words that polite people don't use. :D
 
Fales??? missed that one

Rocky had to go to the silent room for two weeks for using rotten nasty words that polite people don't use.

X---you're way off base here. Oh, "here" seems to not be the OT forum too.

I'll share a story that I've written before. A few years ago there was, and this is true, not made up, a talk show host called Turi Ryder on AM1500 in Minneapolis. She had a sharp tongue and was quite entertaing, to me anyway. Regularly, people would call in and try to berate her. She would stop them and share a service that she and her producer provided. For ten dollars they would get the callers address, come out to their house, find the radio...AND TURN IT OFF!!! If you don't like what Reed is saying, why do you read?

Shel Silversteen wrote, "Freakin' at the Freakers Ball." This is part:

"The greatest of the sadists and the masochists too,

Screaming! "I'll hit you if you hit me!"

You're setting yourself up as too big a target for comparison to totalitarian government. I'll let that one go...

Wasn't our country founded on some principles of acceptance and controversy? Why are you thinking that you're the one to champion behavior?

Oh, and I know that Reed and Wulkie are two different people. Both iconoclasts and tree-lovers. Both look at the world from a little different point. They've taken me into some new places. too.



Tom
 
Originally posted by Crofter
I think the tone and suggestions in the thread starting post are well within the guidelined behaviour of personal attack and flaming and warrant an apology. Certainly tree care site doesn't need it or off topic either for that matter. Move the thread or remove it entirely.
Agreed.
 
I have to vote no on banning OW, me, him and a few others have battled it out in the O/T forum and I'm sure he thinks I'm as far off the mark as I think he is :D , but I will admit if me and him ever agree on something then I will have to rethink my view on it ;) .
 
Though, contribution is important

Y'know, I think I have read O/T twice in the last three years, so when I began reading THIS thread in a forum called "COMMERCIAL TREECARE AND CLIMBING", I was actually thinking that it might actually have something to do with commercial treecare and climbing.

I was absolutely clueless about X-man's problem with OakWilt, and that's because Oakwilt speaks his mind OFF TOPIC, like where this thread should be. I can't say I know of an instance where OakWilt has ranted off-topic topics in commercial treecare and climbing.

Off topic, you should be able to express yourself however you want. No need to dis a fellow member up front here in public when your problem is in the back room. Take this thread off-topic so you don't detract from someone else's valuable learning time.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top