Pauls_Workshop
ArboristSite Operative
Hi guys, thought I'd launch a new discussion for the small end of the milling spectrum, which I think may be especially useful for newbies to the milling hobby or those on the fence of trying it out. A big saw is expensive to jump into and may not be needed to try out the hobby for most non-pros. What is the smallest cc saw (Brand and Model or other features) you have ever used for milling? Be sure to list what mill you used with it too.
I'm only on my 3rd year of milling, and I started with a 42 cc Poulan with 18" bar and only vertical milling with a mini-mill. I got it for all of $25 at a garage sale. It did just fine in wood 6" or 8" diameter, and would cut up to 12" diameter but quite slowly. I've found the thinner width chains can make a huge difference in milling ability, even with a small cc saw, due to less torque required in the cut. My 2nd year, I upgraded to a 60 cc Echo cs-590, and it is tremendous for the money. I used this with an Alaskan Mk III with a 28" bar, as well as with a top down mini-mill and freehand without a mill. Milling vertically vs. with an Alaskan also requires a good bit less cc to mill, as the chips can easily get out of the cut and reduce the frictional drag or torque required in the actual cut, which is present with an Alaskan or horizontal mill. I'm thinking milling vertically can require at least 25% less cc of power than horizontal, all else equal, but this is not a scientific study yet. This year just recently got an older 80.7 cc Echo cs-8000 for the bigger work, but haven't used it much yet due to time problem at the moment for me. It is a beast and easily twice as fast in the same job as the 60 cc Echo, but much heavier of course.
Finally, I've now tried milling with the little-est Echo, a cs-310 with 14" bar and a simple muffler mod and BobL's progressive raker angle at about 6 degrees!! It has an even thinner chain width than the Poulan did and a much faster rpm. It can vertically mill at 31 ccs! Now, it likes not more than 6" diameter hardwood, but can do it quite well, I'd say easily 50% as fast as the 60 cc Echo but better than the 42 cc Poulan did! I like it for trimming the edges of what I mill with the bigger saws for cleanup and also prepping a slab before milling by removing any branch stubs, etc. A wonderful saw for the small branch cutting too up to about 6" or so. I could see the 310 being an awesome wood carving saw, but I'm not into that at this time. Have to say I like it just as much as the cs-590 or 8000, but for totally different reasons of course.
So who else has used a lower powered saw for milling use? What did you do? How did it go? Let's say anything less than 70 cc can qualify for this discussion. - Paul
I'm only on my 3rd year of milling, and I started with a 42 cc Poulan with 18" bar and only vertical milling with a mini-mill. I got it for all of $25 at a garage sale. It did just fine in wood 6" or 8" diameter, and would cut up to 12" diameter but quite slowly. I've found the thinner width chains can make a huge difference in milling ability, even with a small cc saw, due to less torque required in the cut. My 2nd year, I upgraded to a 60 cc Echo cs-590, and it is tremendous for the money. I used this with an Alaskan Mk III with a 28" bar, as well as with a top down mini-mill and freehand without a mill. Milling vertically vs. with an Alaskan also requires a good bit less cc to mill, as the chips can easily get out of the cut and reduce the frictional drag or torque required in the actual cut, which is present with an Alaskan or horizontal mill. I'm thinking milling vertically can require at least 25% less cc of power than horizontal, all else equal, but this is not a scientific study yet. This year just recently got an older 80.7 cc Echo cs-8000 for the bigger work, but haven't used it much yet due to time problem at the moment for me. It is a beast and easily twice as fast in the same job as the 60 cc Echo, but much heavier of course.
Finally, I've now tried milling with the little-est Echo, a cs-310 with 14" bar and a simple muffler mod and BobL's progressive raker angle at about 6 degrees!! It has an even thinner chain width than the Poulan did and a much faster rpm. It can vertically mill at 31 ccs! Now, it likes not more than 6" diameter hardwood, but can do it quite well, I'd say easily 50% as fast as the 60 cc Echo but better than the 42 cc Poulan did! I like it for trimming the edges of what I mill with the bigger saws for cleanup and also prepping a slab before milling by removing any branch stubs, etc. A wonderful saw for the small branch cutting too up to about 6" or so. I could see the 310 being an awesome wood carving saw, but I'm not into that at this time. Have to say I like it just as much as the cs-590 or 8000, but for totally different reasons of course.
So who else has used a lower powered saw for milling use? What did you do? How did it go? Let's say anything less than 70 cc can qualify for this discussion. - Paul