....Value is in the eye of the beholder, if you say it is timber value only, then you don't have a clue yourself. ....
Yes...BUT, in this case, value is in the eye of the law (where it should be).
The question is can you get the 'law' to recognize these as "landscape" trees vs. "timber" trees. Plantiff calls consulting arborist who testifies about their landscape value. Defendent calls consulting forester who determines they are timber. Unfortunately, I doubt "plans" change the value from timber to landscape... I don't say that because I don't want to see a timber pimp nailed to the wall (I would like nothing more), but because I wouldn't want somebody's expectations to be too unrealistic.