Originally posted by Menchhofer
regarding tipping the bradfords, especially when there is frequently nothing to tip back too? Would this not create unwanted new growth making the tree thicker than ever?
And why is the new growth unwanted? If reduction cuts force lateral sprouting that grows into tangled branches, all the better--trees are much less likely to split apart if their branches intertwine. Diseases like fireblight will be more likely perhaps, but that is a small price to pay for structural stability.
Internodal cuts can create a more desired effect (resprouting) than cuts to nodes, on magnolias and hollies, anyway. I see Bradfords here get lollipopped; that's one valid way to handle the species. It's high-mtc. and unnatural looking but hey we are dealing with trees that WILL split apart if nothing is done.
Murph posted pics on the REduction Pruning thread that showed good thinning.
http://www.arboristsite.com/attach/7398.jpg
How's it look now murph, fill in as expected?
I've seen Bradfords with excellent structure due to nursery training. Dissing the species or cultivar is Kneejerk and easy, but not always right.
Re terms, bradfords don't typically windthrow, they split.
Let's use ANSI terms for pruning--clean, raise, reduce and thin. Reduction considers species, while all "tipping" does not. Lollipopping a Bradford is borderline OK in my book, but due to different response and mature size it'd be a crime on most oaks, maples etc. That's IMO based on NC trees.
