Strewth. My Poulan is not the equal of my Stihl, Redmax, or Husqvarna saws. They are faster and more powerful, feel better built and seem in every respect as though they should be more durable. They are better saws, no question about it. But I'm in the "waste not, want not" camp, and I can't stand not to get the last drop of life out of a tool. The little green bugger starts and runs well, and although not particularly fast, it will pull a sharp chain on short bar through oak or locust just fine, and it has cut a lot of oak and locust, some of which I could just barely buck from both sides. Recently I used it to cut up a bunch of oak crotches and twisted bits from a tree that was just flat full of hardware, 190 years old and some of the metal was darned near the center. Sure, the MS 660 would have been a bazillion times faster, but better to toast a $9 chain than a $15 or $20 one. I'm not a pro and wouldn't claim to have subjected it to pro-level use, but I've run this saw a lot more than most homeowners would and it hasn't fallen apart or burned up, and the parts that have worn out would have worn out on any saw and were easily replaced. You can't take that away from it.
I wonder if some of the bad rap these saws get is due to the proliferation of "reconditioned" units.
Jack