Do any of you members think it would be a seller? Any feedback much appreciated!
Nice, simple design.
Part of the question is how accurately people need to measure the depth gauge offset. Race filers and chain obsessed folks might be interested in a few thousandths. Most people are satisfied with the basic depth gauge tools available, and can use feeler gauges and a straight edge to measure this, if interested. Once one depth gauge is set, do you need to measure each link if using a grinder? Is this accuracy more important to performance, compared to rounding over the depth gauges after filing/grinding?
Then there are folks who prefer the progressive depth gauge approach (mentioned in earlier posts); or prefer to measure the angle, instead of a fixed offset, using the digital angle finders ('DAF', 'tilt box') also mentioned above. Classic thread on this is:
http://www.arboristsite.com/communi...ly-progressive-depth-raker-generators.114624/
That said . . . $30 to $40 (including the dial indicator?) is within the range for most chainsaw enthusiasts for a specialty tool. Could be useful for a shop, as a training tool, to clearly demonstrate to customers why their chains are not cutting.
If I was interested in that kind of precision, I would want to measure the chain in a flat, machined groove, instead of along a curved bar. I would also want a back plate, similar to what BobL did in the FOP thread (or something else) to prevent me from tipping the gauge (forward and back), affecting the readings, as noted. These features would raise the price quite a bit. I like the thought given to skip chain compatibility.
Philbert