1 saw plan???

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Lionsfan

Addicted to ArboristSite
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Aug 11, 2019
Messages
2,003
Reaction score
12,755
Location
Cheboygan, MI
The logging crew is done in our woodlot, and I've got a 2-3 year project ahead cleaning up tops. It's all Sugar Maple for the most part, and most of it is under 20". If you were limited to toting 1 saw for this type of work, what would it be???
 

Attachments

  • 20231225_122554.jpg
    20231225_122554.jpg
    3.8 MB
  • 20231225_122809.jpg
    20231225_122809.jpg
    4.7 MB
  • 20231225_122737.jpg
    20231225_122737.jpg
    1.5 MB
  • 20231225_123105.jpg
    20231225_123105.jpg
    2.5 MB
I really like my 550 XP MK 2 for that size wood, but if you can spare an extra $300 the 400 Stihl looks and feels like a good saw with good reviews. I have not had the chance to use a 400 yet, but have picked one up in the dealers shop ( yeah I know, wow).
 
The MS261 would handle that sized wood with ease, great for limb up and blocking up the stems, no need to carry an overweight bigger saw for no real reason .I used an 044 and later a MS440 for most of my hardwood cutting days until I learned a smaller saw can do the same thing with far less weight to carry about, I now run a MS362 more and more these days.
 
I have both a 562 and a 550XP MK2 and I'm doing a lot of the same thing you are. Different species, Doug fir, Madrone, Broadleaf Maple and Black Oak. I find myself using the 550 almost exclusively. It's set up with a 20" bar, with full skip semi-chisel chain.
If you're cutting mostly tops, most of your cuts will be much smaller than 20" and the lighter weight saw will be of more benefit than you might realize. A 550 will handle a 20" bar just fine; it may take a few seconds longer in a 20" cut than the 60cc saw will, but will make up for it by not tiring you out as quickly while making the hundreds of smaller cuts you'll be making.
My recommendation would be 550 XP or MS 261.
 
I’ve done a fair bit of that type of work and believe me you’ll want the lightest saw to handle the job. I used jonsered 2159/65/71’s. Then I got smart and got a ported 2152.
cutting 20” hard maple I’d probably want to try a stihl 400, but if it’s more limbwood I’d lean toward a 261
 
The logging crew is done in our woodlot, and I've got a 2-3 year project ahead cleaning up tops. It's all Sugar Maple for the most part, and most of it is under 20". If you were limited to toting 1 saw for this type of work, what would it be???
For me it would be the Stihl MS500i. Yes, it may be a bit overqualified for that kind of work. But I have found it less fatiguing to use than smaller saws, as it cuts faster and you don't have to bear down on it to make it cut. Prior to buying it, I went from some non-descript Remington saw to a Stihl 038 Super to a Stihl MS441C. The MS500i has been the easiest to use.
 
I have both a 562 and a 550XP MK2 and I'm doing a lot of the same thing you are. Different species, Doug fir, Madrone, Broadleaf Maple and Black Oak. I find myself using the 550 almost exclusively. It's set up with a 20" bar, with full skip semi-chisel chain.
If you're cutting mostly tops, most of your cuts will be much smaller than 20" and the lighter weight saw will be of more benefit than you might realize. A 550 will handle a 20" bar just fine; it may take a few seconds longer in a 20" cut than the 60cc saw will, but will make up for it by not tiring you out as quickly while making the hundreds of smaller cuts you'll be making.
My recommendation would be 550 XP or MS 261.
I have a 550 MKII and really like the saw, particularly the handling.
I’ve done a fair bit of that type of work and believe me you’ll want the lightest saw to handle the job. I used jonsered 2159/65/71’s. Then I got smart and got a ported 2152.
cutting 20” hard maple I’d probably want to try a stihl 400, but if it’s more limbwood I’d lean toward a 261
This is sorta where I'm at. When I was 25, the 371 was the ultimate saw for that kinda work, and you could not have convinced me otherwise. At 52, I'm a bit more open open minded about something a bit lighter.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top