logger 12345
husqvarna pilot
nice saw,nice build,best of luck with it!!!
must be heavy beast when it's all set to go...
must be heavy beast when it's all set to go...
That's right Willie, I figured you left some tolerance......besides, we'd have to listen to a big crying if you ever traveled to Freeport City!......Hahahahahahaha!
nice saw,nice build,best of luck with it!!!
must be heavy beast when it's all set to go...
Once again, Nice work!
Why does that piston look like a Popup?
Thanks.
Now that you mention it, it does look like a domed piston doesn't it. Its not, I think its just the way the light is reflecting off of it.
will what do you use in your cleaner???
Thanks.
Now that you mention it, it does look like a domed piston doesn't it. Its not, I think its just the way the light is reflecting off of it.
I was going to say, Where did you get that!!
Another question, is that all the chamfer needed on the exhaust/ intake port?
Looking good Will......The saw I mean :msp_sad:.
I gotta get me an USC before long, Just not sure what Im looking for yet.
Usually just paint thinner, or mineral spirits is pretty much the same thing, this time I used Lacquer thinner, though its a little more aggressive. That's just for carbs, I put the thinner in a coffee pot and float that in the USC that has just water in it.
Yes, you don't need much. I may actually go a little more near the outside of the port since its a little wider then 65% of bore Dia.
Thanks.
Yes the USC's are great, got mine from ebay.
i like seafoam also.
O.k. Was not sure. I have seen some pictures on here and every one looks a little different. +/- Chamfer.
Can you have too much chamfer?
Looks nice Will. How soon til you get to run it?
I've been trying a lower intake duration than I've used in the past Will. I'm in no way saying that this is the way to go or even that it helps at this point, but my thinking is along these lines....
We talk a lot about intake opening point, but what about the relationship between intake closing and transfer opening? We think about the blowdown time, but never do we mention the amount of time that crankcase pressure is building between intake closing and transfer opening.
I'm seeing a pattern based on the size of the crankcase and this number. As we all have found, some saws "like" more blowdown....some "like" less. I'm thinking that this is because of crankcase volume vs displacement.
The lower the intake and the higher the transfers the less time the pressure builds in the crankcase, so by leaving the intake as is and just raising the transfers.........????
Keep in mind that all this is just me thinking out loud, but I wouldn't lower that intake until I saw how well it pulled a long bar. Sure a high revving saw is a hoot to run, but a saw that has a butt load of torque is a fine thing.
Sorry for the long winded derail.....carry on.
Enter your email address to join: