I don't worry about turning the file but after each tooth I do tap the end of the file on the saw vice. I wear 3x glasses while filing usually and can see the fines flying.
I agree...Why sharpen the cutters razor sharp and then put a piece of hardened steel on top of the cutter corners, and fold down the ultra thin top chrome layer...
they are still sitting on the top corner of the cutter...the type of guide the sits atop both the cutters ahead of, and following the raker...
Oh yes... I know...they are still sitting on the top corner of the cutter...
lol...well since you're sleeping well these days then maybe I should shut my big mouth...that wouldn't be very interactive or fun for me though ...lolOh yes... I know...
What I like about that style (I fixed the image) is it gauges the depth by the relationship between the two cutters on each side of the raker. I'm not so sure it really makes any difference, but it makes more sense in my mind I sleep better
*
I went a logging show yesterday, and I talked to a few people about this, and some of the most experienced loggers and competitors, eliminate the rakers from their chains. They have a feel for how to keep their saw RPM at max torque when cutting....Many guys are dam good at it too
I went a logging show yesterday, and I talked to a few people about this, and some of the most experienced loggers and competitors, eliminate the rakers from their chains. They have a feel for how to keep their saw RPM at max torque when cutting....
What exactly do you mean by no rakers. I am with Hinerman and cant see how no rakers would work out?I went a logging show yesterday, and I talked to a few people about this, and some of the most experienced loggers and competitors, eliminate the rakers from their chains. They have a feel for how to keep their saw RPM at max torque when cutting....
Starting from scratch with a new chain, and just doing regular maintenance sharpening, you really do not need a gauge, just count the flat file strokes, and observe the size of the flat-file "footprint" on top of the raker.
That gauge you are showing is the one I started using more than 30 years ago, but now when I am not a daily user anymore, I have skipped the gauge and just do the eyeball thing. Good enough for my little firewood hobby...But I do enjoy having as sharp as possible...And as you point out, nothing annoys more than when you can't make a straight cut...
Appsolutey! In a perfect world, if cutters were always the same. I have no problem with free handing consistant depths and angles. I did a lot of thinning (spacing) in my earlier days with low rakers and rocky ground So it will always be the cutters on the outside (right side) that are going to hit. It was not worth my time to file the cutters down evenly as I was making about $30 - $55 per gas tank on most contracts. It just cut good until it didn't and I'd replace the chain. When I started cutting bigger wood and learning how to use and file & sharpen for the dogs, is when I realyI went a logging show yesterday, and I talked to a few people about this, and some of the most experienced loggers and competitors, eliminate the rakers from their chains. They have a feel for how to keep their saw RPM at max torque when cutting....
Starting from scratch with a new chain, and just doing regular maintenance sharpening, you really do not need a gauge, just count the flat file strokes, and observe the size of the flat-file "footprint" on top of the raker.
That gauge you are showing is the one I started using more than 30 years ago, but now when I am not a daily user anymore, I have skipped the gauge and just do the eyeball thing. Good enough for my little firewood hobby...But I do enjoy having as sharp as possible...And as you point out, nothing annoys more than when you can't make a straight cut
Pretty sure the OP is talking about 'removing the rakers without a guage. Not removing them completely, that dosent fit with what the giys he talked to are saying about maximizing revs. its there between the lines guys.Seriously? That is interesting. I would like to see that in action; and try it myself. I have taken rakers too low (by accident) in the past and it sucked for me cutting. I can't imagine NO rakers.
Back to the OP, NO on rotating the file. Don't see any advantage, only problems, as already pointed out in post #7. I did love the effects you put in the video---very impressive.
...some of the most experienced loggers and competitors, eliminate the rakers from their chains.
Seriously? That is interesting. I would like to see that in action; and try it myself.
I am with Hinerman and cant see how no rakers would work out?
I have a couple of chains that I've completely removed the rakers with a small cutoff wheel... and I also increase the angle of the top plate. Cutting softer wood, such as Silver Maple, fir, White Cedar and the like they rip through like greased lightening. They also work well for bucking smallish (say, 10 inches or less) harder wood, like oak... zing... zing... zing. They don't work for felling... as soon as you hook your dogs in a try to pivot they bite too much and stop the chain. And in anything dead 'n' dry they run really rough... scary rough.Pretty sure the OP is talking about 'removing the rakers without a guage. Not removing them completely...
No $hit...lolI have a couple of chains that I've completely removed the rakers with a small cutoff wheel... and I also increase the angle of the top plate. They don't work for felling... as soon as you hook your dogs in and try to pivot they bite too much and stop the chain. And in anything dead 'n' dry they run really rough... scary rough.
*
LolWOW. I am intrigued to say the least. Maybe I will find an old chain and give it a try; but like I said, I have taken them too low before and it sucked balls...Maybe I just don't have the touch; but I'm not ham fisted either. I sold a saw to a friend with a chain I took the rakers too low, not even close to total removal. I will never hear the end of it, he hasn't stopped whining about it ever since.
I'm not changing my handle it goes back to the early 1970s CB radio eraWe should call him whitefinger.