Isn't the SWL on a portawrap 2000lbs?
And the weight you are lowering a heck of a lot more than that?
I didn't know they had load handling capability.I agreee with some (but not all, lol) of what you are saying, MDS.
I have occasional nightmares as reminders of testing immorality and SWL's!
One example was a two week stint in a hospital 5 years ago from a preventable act of stupidity that really should have killed me or at least ended my career. Got myself catapulted out of an old Asplund while using it to crane a log into the back of the truck, (that hank of old bluestreak failed at somewhat less than 8100 lb) and landed on my back very, very close to the exhaust stack. But I digress. My son was a good lad, and folded up the boom and lifted the outriggers BEFORE making the 911 call. Told the cops, medics, doctors that I had simply slipped and fallen off the roof of the truck.
With at least some of the newer portawraps (Sherrill's stainless one being an example) being produced in China, I think ignoring SWLs and pushing things to their limits may yield unforgiving and maybe lethal consequences far in excess of the deductible on your commercial business insurance policy.
They don't. You know this, I know this, and so does everybody else here.
But I can't tell you how many times I "got away" with using a 1972 Asplundh (on an '86 International S-1900) to "crane" logs into the back of the truck.
Incidently, the summer after my human cannonball act, I sold that truck to a competitor (with FULL disclosure - plus we used to work together a fair bit, and still help each other out on jobs once in awhile), and he is still operating it.
As the third owner (original one was the City of Barrie, Ontario) it will probably kill him someday.
My big problem with SWL, no one talks about tensile. Een with ropes they talk about ABS, or average breaking strength. Minimum breaking strength should be know by the user.
FWIW, I've heard at shows that hardwear uses a 5:1 or 4:1 ratio, the 10:1 is a rule of thumb for shock loading tree rope.
The dimensions of the pine in question are 30" at the butt, by 70 feet tall. It stands in a group with two smaller pines that also need to go, so if I decide not to "hang" the big tree, I might use it as an anchor for doing that with the other two trees. Your method on those two elms sounds like it was a good way to go. I think that if you lower the trees slowly you are not putting much stress on the rigging line because there is no shock load. I think the weakest link would be the sling holding the block, because it's getting the force of two legs of rope...the working end and the standing end going to the porta-wrap.
Ok so that being said 10g's at 5:1 for the porty which I think is a little conservative for the large one but it is a starting point. I would have to agree with you JPS minimum breaking strength should be the standard instead of the ABS.
Their argument is that MBS could be outlier data, well throw the anomolies out and tell me what the bottom of the curve is. Statistically significant low end of the curve? ahh screw it, MBS I', sticking to it
Enter your email address to join: