clearance said:Wow, all them letters, what does it all mean?
TreeCo said:J.P. Hallman and Clearance,
What are you two bozo's doing in a plant health thread?
Just in here to run down Arborist?
Get lost punks.
Good post Larry, I am pleased you got my point. I think if the letters behind the name mean true competence that is good. However, I have met a few people who had the ISA colors prominently displayed but in reality were a few bricks short of a load, in regards to safety and common sense. So the letters, not always. The letters I have say C.U.A.-certified utilty arborist, granted by the government trade dept., I had to work 1200 hours around powerlines and go to utility school for 6 weeks over two years. Instructors watched and graded me climbing, many tests and a Provincial final (some of it was multiple choice!). In other words, I had to prove competence in the real world. I applaud people for increasing thier knowledge about trees, great, help the trees, not your ego.Ax-man said:Clearance, I can see your point, but let me ask this, even if the letters after a name don't mean anything isn't it better than just plain nothing??? Ever since I have been in tree business there has been an outcry for professionalism to raise the standards. The ISA took a good first step toward that goal, but it is like so many other things, a minority of arborists step forward toward advancing the standards of the industry, while the majority become nah sayers and chant why bother going to the expense and trouble of taking a stupid test it doesn't mean anything. A few letters after your name shows you at least made an attempt to better present yourself as a professional with some sort of documentation.
I myself feel a little more comfortable with the CA. certification. Why, because to me it is better than nothing, because if you have nothing then you are nothing.
If you guys think the test is so simple and easy, what is stopping you from taking it, even if it a rudimentary first step and passing it means nothing it sure isn't going to hurt you and you might be surprized at what you might learn that you didn't know before.
Larry
treeseer said:"No kidding...113 out of 150. Don't believe I'd have told anybody."
jp, that's the minimum passing score, 75%. I never said that was my score(which shall remain topsecret). at last count I heard 75 people had passed out of 113 that tried; that's why I say it's not that easy.
I'm a big Alex Trebek fan too! The champ today bet bold on the Daily Doubles and won em both. He'll be on top for a while, you think?
jp hallman said:...certifications are only for other certified peoples satisfaction.
Ax-man said:With this kind of attitude we might as well just become complacent and stagnate in our desire to learn more and not try to be better than what we already are.
Larry
Larry, I agree with you about education and ongoing learning, that is all good. I think Jmaks reasons/reason for wanting these letters is pretty well spelled out here. It looks like this one got batted right outta the park. Nailed it. Stopped the BS. Called a spade a spade.jmack said:does isa board certified master arborist hold more weight than the asca rca title ?
Enter your email address to join: