Burnham
ArboristSite Operative
Butch, I think the minor amount of movement between the pad and shank, which I would say is less than 1/4 inch in any direction, is about the same thing as it being totally rigid when in use. That's with the only connection between the pad and shank being provided by the strap threaded through the slot at the top of the shank and wrapped around the pad and your calf. Actually, one of the really nice things about these pads, aside from the comfort, is that there is no slop in the transfer of position from your leg to the gaff itself. What I mean is, if you adjust your lower leg position a bit, the position of the gaff refects that precisely ever time exactly the same amount. This translates into very accurate control of the gaff position and angle.
I expect I would be happy with the way your mount works. My only objection was the potential weakening caused by the bolt hole, and the needless hassle of doing so, which seemed to put you out, and caused you denigrate the manufacturer for the way their product is presented.
I don't know about additional articulation...like I said, I like the control of the gaff position I get with the pad the way it is. More movement might be a negative thing.
I expect I would be happy with the way your mount works. My only objection was the potential weakening caused by the bolt hole, and the needless hassle of doing so, which seemed to put you out, and caused you denigrate the manufacturer for the way their product is presented.
I don't know about additional articulation...like I said, I like the control of the gaff position I get with the pad the way it is. More movement might be a negative thing.