Chainsaw recommendations for Ich

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

IchWarriorMkII

ArboristSite Guru
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Messages
818
Reaction score
162
Location
Colorado
So here I am, been thinking too much again. Thanks for everyone's reply in the Dolmar thread. I know don't feel so afraid, and unable to be able to run a Dolmar... which is exotic for these parts. That has added to my thoughts...

First, I run saws as tools as much as I run them as a hobby. I need a functional set of them to accomplish tasks on the ranch. I also need them to cut firewood to warm my, and other's homes. But, since I kind of like running them, I spend too much time thinking of the most exotic and fun saws to have, as well as the most super efficient set of saws. So, anyways:

I've got my 353 back, and it handles a 20" bar well. 361 always beats it, but its kinda redundant to me to have 2 saws that run the sames bars save for a 24" bar. If I was rich, I'd have both... but I think the 353 handles 20" and under very well. However, the 361 isn't the best at a 24" bar. Its well enough, but at altitude and its already needing full skip... I'd like a bigger saw to run a 24" bar full time.

(So Im probably going to off the 361, sell it to my cutting buddy at a good guy price...)

I'd like something thats going to handle full comp chain, easily. I've thought about a 441, 7300, 7900, 575, and a half wrap 460. The only other bar in the foreseeable future is a 20" with semi chisel to handle juniper wood. I feel that a 3/8 SC chain stays in better cutting shape longer than .325 (might just be my perception though).

For sake of discussion, what say ye? 24", full comp, what saw in softwoods?
 
Last edited:
Yes its working well...

It has been picky and not wanted to hold an idle a few times though... Im not sure what thats about exactly.

Its sported a 32" bar for some time now and cuts well provided I do my part with the chain sharpening. Its taken down another cottonwood (that was in a yard) and numerous cottonwoods in the fields. Im pleased with the 460, good blend of power and weight for my needs I think.
 
Your Voice of Reason

HAHAHAHA, the great saw debate. Buy them, try them, if you don't like them, sell them. I have determined you really have to run a machine to judge for yourself.

Here is my take on things. I cut standing dead or dead-fall/blowdowns for use as firewood. I rarely run into a tree that a 28" bar won't take care of - and the only time it becomes a problem is when falling. You can cut over the top when you are bucking it up if your bar is too short - not much of a problem, really.

I like big power, a compact frame, lightweight, lots of fuel and oil capacity and the shortest bar possible. I have grown to LOVE my 5100 for limbing - it truly is an excellent saw in every sense of the word - ergonomics are excellent, fuel economy is excellent, anti-vibe is stellar, and the chain speed is lightning fast! I think everyone needs a 5100 - hands down.

My favorite 'firewood' saw to date is a 695 Shindaiwa. I have several and run all different length bars on them depending on what I am cutting. 16" and 18" with an 8-pin, and 20", 24" and 28" with a 7-pin.

For a guy handling big softwood trees, I would say a STRONG 5-cube saw with a 28" or 32" bar should be about all he would need. Mind you, this is a firewood cutter, not a pro logger who is getting paid by scale. That said, I can tell you from running a 385XP - it is a strong saw that mods well, but it is large (read, not compact - wide load). It has good A/V, but like all newer Husky saws, a $hitty muffler - Dents easy, and cracks - and a junk side chain adjuster. I like my 981 Efco so far. The muffler on this saw is top notch - it is unrestricted, and it has a nice, sturdy 'skid plate' to protect it when bucking big logs.

You already have a 460 Stihl - so your only options (unless you sell it) would be a 395XP or a 660. If you want to keep it Stihl, stick with your 361, 460 and pick up a 660. I think the 441 is fat like the 385XP. I like the 7900 Dolmar, but am holding off for a full-wrap version, and with the European spike kit installed. I really like the 3cube, 4cube, 5cube plan myself - this is for work saws. Play saws, well, as long as you enjoy them, get as many as you can afford!

Josh
 
Last edited:
If you liked the 361 you would probably be satisfied with the 441 with the full comp. 24” bar.:chainsaw:
 
I really can't say enough good about the 7900.
It is all it is cracked up to be.
Only problem I have with mine is I broke a part of the chain brake when I flipped my dump cart, one rivet, and back in business.
I was cutting super hard oak with a 24 inch bar just today, and the only saw that comes close is the 66.

:chainsawguy:
 
Yes! Im totally kidding. I didn't want to have a fairly light hearted discussion about chainsaws on a chainsaw discussion board. Nope, if thats the direction this thread takes, Im going to be PISSED.

OK! Musch doesn't seem to complain about his saw lineup. I suggest you study his list:

Stihl MS 260
Husky 346xp
Husky 357xp
Jonsered 2171
Dolmar 7900
Stihl 066 MAGNUM

Yep, looks good, doesn't it?

Now, forward march!
 
Why not just use the 24" on the 460 you already have?

If that is not an option, I would have taken my chances on the Dolmar 7900, for constant use of a 24" bar.
 
Valid point Troll, and I do often, but I'd rather leave a 28" or 32" bar on it. It pulls one of those sizes well. Also I like it with the 3/4 wrap to have the longer bar for felling trees, when they are not blown down.
 
Why not just use the 24" on the 460 you already have?

If that is not an option, I would have taken my chances on the Dolmar 7900, for constant use of a 24" bar.

Thats what I was thinking???? but the 460 is abit heavier,,,, A 441 is almost the same weight as the 460 but slightly lighter with a bit of power & fuel efficiency advantage over the 440's,,,,,, I have a 440 and an 044 and a 460,,,, and the 440's are noticebly lightlter than the 460 but I tell you this they have amazing power for a 70cc saw,,,, I run a 28" reduced weight oregon power match bar with semi skip on one and a 24 Stihl ES w/ fullcomp on the other,, both do very well in oak and pine,,,,,

28" or 32" on my 460 with semi skip BTW

I'm stihl thinking have a 441 in my future,,,,, err ahemmm,,, well just because????
 
Last edited:
Thats what I was thinking???? but the 460 is abit heavier,,,, A 441 is almost the same weight as the 460 but slightly lighter ....

He he, that is a topic that was beaten to death in the "Da Prince of saws...." tread, and I still believe the 441 is slightly heavier than the 460....

:yoyo: :yoyo: :laugh: :laugh:
 
He he, that is a topic that was beaten to death in the "Da Prince of saws...." tread, and I still believe the 441 is slightly heavier than the 460....

:yoyo: :yoyo: :laugh: :laugh:

But it balances better, huh, Gary?:rock:
 
Yes! Im totally kidding. I didn't want to have a fairly light hearted discussion about chainsaws on a chainsaw discussion board. Nope, if thats the direction this thread takes, Im going to be PISSED.

HAHAHAHA!:laugh: Ya got me... good luck on what ever saw you decide to get!:D

But it balances better, huh, Gary?:rock:

441??? Hmmm... hell I'd have a 32" bar on it myself... bein' it is sooooooooooo heavy... why not make it heavier?:laugh:

Gary
 
880

Just get a 880 or 3120.....problem solved, eh?LOL:jester:
I would get a 7900 or 385, or if you REALLY want power get a 395 or 660. Then retire the 460 to 24" and put the 32" on the bigger saw.;) :D :rock: :rockn: :laugh:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top