Glad I didn't (and don't) have to carry those!
Philbert
Philbert
I saw a demonstration for a nascar type chainsaw refueling system. The saw’s refueling cap gets replaced with a new insert. The MSR fuel bottle also has an adapter that replaces it’s cap. You unlock the bottle and the saw using the scrench, then press the bottle into the saw insert and twist. The fuel in the bottle is dumped into the tank and the vapor in the saw is directed into the bottle. Basically doing what the EPA fuel dispensers do. Every saw needs an insert and every bottle needs the fueling adapter. This keeps any fuel or fuel vapors from being exposed to an ignition source. I don’t know the cost, but it’s expensive.
Are they unable to modify the saws?
It doesn't make sense for American farmers, already breaking their backs and going under, to have to pay even more for an additional feature because the few saws needed by fire fighters need the feature.
Liability laws would not allow that - one non-firefighter gets geysered and the plaintiff's lawyer shows that the company already had a solution. Plus, the cost for any improved venting 'solution' would probably be pennies per saw in volume.There should be no need for farmers and homeowners to pay for specialized features. . . . A better solution to the fueling problem could be incorporated into these saws only, without raising the price of regular production models.
Good point, however it could be done. To vent a particular pressure you could use a tmp style of valve. Same thing that hot water tanks use except this one would be just pressure activated. You could also make a float valve that blocks off anything if it is not in the standard flat position.Having seen the Forest Service report on fuel geysering; I’m confident it is being made a bigger deal of than it actually is. How do you propose venting positive pressure from a fuel tank affixed to an engine designed to be used in any position?
Liability laws would not allow that - one non-firefighter gets geysered and the plaintiff's lawyer shows that the company already had a solution. Plus, the cost for any improved venting 'solution' would probably be pennies per saw in volume. Philbert
With all this talk about venting fuel vapor... I have no interest in flammable & explosive fuel vapors coming from the tank as I’m handling a burning snag. Even if it is a one way check valve.
The other thing is that if you vent those vapors the pressure in the tank decreases and then more fuel is then liable to flash off because of it and you’re caught in a positive feedback loop.
If you were a nozzle jockey, I understand your shame.We are talking about fire watchers here.... not day in, day out timber fallers.
Go ahead and light me up. I did one season on fire and I'm still ashamed of it.
Not hiding behind the internet, PM for my address if you've got a bone to pick, not an issue.
We are talking about fire watchers here.... not day in, day out timber fallers.
Go ahead and light me up. I did one season on fire and I'm still ashamed of it.
Not hiding behind the internet, PM for my address if you've got a bone to pick, not an issue.
I don’t know much about fire fighters in forest fire. It takes a hell of a man or woman smokejumper to fight forest fires my hats off to them. I’m surprised it’s not listed higher on the most dangerous jobs. The wind can change and claim lives at anytime.
I fought a fire when a 1,000amp electrical box shorted out while test running a machine. My co worker froze right near the bright yellow orange ball. Me and another co worker pulled him out of there. Them we contained the 100 yo oil soaked oak wood floor. If the few of us didn’t help we’d be toasting hotdogs for a month. This shop was many acres large. Full of oil soaked oak flooring.