jomoco
Tree Freak
Okay, since we're the ones that deal with chippers on a daily basis, I want to get a hands on consensus on whether you guys are comfortable with the existing safety mechanisms on today's chippers.
With more and more cheap unskilled labor being used behind chippers in our industry these days, the number of fatalities involving chippers is growing at an alarming rate.
Some of you may know that I offered my patented chipper safety system to all the major chipper manufacturers for free back in 1998 following the rate of accidental deaths involving chippers jumping after the introduction of hydraulically fed whole tree chippers onto the market in the 90's.
The manufacturer's position on this important subject is that they prefer limited liability now as opposed to potential total liability if they incorporate a safety system capable of keeping an unconscious chipper operator from being eaten alive, if for any reason the safety system failed or malfunctioned.
It seems to me that their reasoning is flawed in that if the safety bar on their chipper failed, they would be in the same position regardless, which is why these safety systems must be rigorously maintained and checked on a regular basis like any other industrial safety system.
The key difference between today's chipper safety systems and the one's offered by myself (metal detection) and the Australian chap (RFID detection) to the manufacturers, are that the current systems require an alert chipper operator to activate it, where as ours are capable of keeping an incapacitated or unconscious operator with the proper safety gear on from being eaten alive.
The fatality statistics involving wood chippers today speak for themselves.
So the poll question is as follows:
Sould these chipper manufacturers incorporate a safety system capable of keeping an incapacitated operator from being fed through their chippers if the technology exists, and can be proven reliable and effective?
Should the chipper manufacturers reject advanced safety systems and stick with their current level of safety devices being manufactured and marketed now?
Thanks for your participation on this important subject.
jomoco
With more and more cheap unskilled labor being used behind chippers in our industry these days, the number of fatalities involving chippers is growing at an alarming rate.
Some of you may know that I offered my patented chipper safety system to all the major chipper manufacturers for free back in 1998 following the rate of accidental deaths involving chippers jumping after the introduction of hydraulically fed whole tree chippers onto the market in the 90's.
The manufacturer's position on this important subject is that they prefer limited liability now as opposed to potential total liability if they incorporate a safety system capable of keeping an unconscious chipper operator from being eaten alive, if for any reason the safety system failed or malfunctioned.
It seems to me that their reasoning is flawed in that if the safety bar on their chipper failed, they would be in the same position regardless, which is why these safety systems must be rigorously maintained and checked on a regular basis like any other industrial safety system.
The key difference between today's chipper safety systems and the one's offered by myself (metal detection) and the Australian chap (RFID detection) to the manufacturers, are that the current systems require an alert chipper operator to activate it, where as ours are capable of keeping an incapacitated or unconscious operator with the proper safety gear on from being eaten alive.
The fatality statistics involving wood chippers today speak for themselves.
So the poll question is as follows:
Sould these chipper manufacturers incorporate a safety system capable of keeping an incapacitated operator from being fed through their chippers if the technology exists, and can be proven reliable and effective?
Should the chipper manufacturers reject advanced safety systems and stick with their current level of safety devices being manufactured and marketed now?
Thanks for your participation on this important subject.
jomoco
Last edited: