Dear John Paul,
I'm certainly not trying to "bash competition" or make fun of ones choice in chippers. I'm sure Rob had very good reasons for buying his machine (as he pointed out). I was simply trying to point out some obvious feature differences. This is what gives competitors "an edge" over one another.
If you remember back 10-15 years ago everybody and there brother were building chippers. When the economic crunch hit in the eighties only the strong survived. There were several "small time" chipper manufacturers driven out of business because of it. The top three chippers made today in (my opinion) are Vermeer, Bandit and Morbark. Two of three (Vermeer, Morbark) were survivors of the crunch (Bandit started around 1983-1985 approx.)
As demonstrated this certainly can create a Chevy, Ford and Dodge scenario or John Deere, Cat and Cummins rivalry dispute, if you will.
Who is better? Everyone has their own niche or claim to fame regarding their machinery. I'm sure you could go back and forth for months on that issue.
I love competition and I think companies need it to survive. This business (in some areas) is getting to be pretty cut-throat and I don't wish to be confused as a responsible party for making that happen. We are no stranger to these games just as much as the gentleman I was reading about in another forum regarding the tree guys who will beat any written or advertised pricing.
My motto is: "You never want to any further lengths than necessary regarding a competitor because they may be signing your paychecks tomorrow".
I apologize if I offended you and Rob but everyone is allowed to have an opinion.
Jason