theory behind this
OK;
You’ all can chew me out soundly if I'm incorrect on this theory behind bar tip size and kick back potential.
The larger sized sprocket tip has an increased kick back risk
because it has a greater area where the tip type of kick back can occur. {Similar thought process on the old bow bars.}
This does not mean that a smaller tipped bar could not have the greater kick back risk, depending on how the bar & chain are set up in certain woods.
Because the smaller tip bars place the tooth out even further from the raker than a larger tip on the sharper turn. (Admittedly a slight change.)
Now look at this guy from Scandinavia boring with his tip at the 2:30 minute mark. Go to
http://www.skogforsk.se/KunskapDirekt/default.aspx?p=11362&bmp=11727
Then click on Film för bredband then Motorsågsarbete i stormskog (8 min)
In a lot of the dead wood that I cut, some hardwood and especially dead hardwood that I've cut occasionally, you would never consider boring at that angle of attack. I believe he is cutting spruce which is a very soft softwood.
Now the obvious caveat; Your understanding of how your saw is set up plus the knowledge of how that set up will work in the wood in front of you plus your boring technique. Will have a lot more to do will avoiding kickback during bore cuts than the tip size.
Stihl does admit on their web site that the smaller tipped bars will have greater wear in repeated boring operations.
I'm ready for my ___ chewing.