Brock2saws
ArboristSite Lurker
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2004
- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 0
I apologize if this has been covered before.
I was studying for the ISA TW/CC cert with an EHAP/AR program from TCIA. The video suggests 2 techniques for AR that don't seem like good ideas to me.
1. If a climber is in contact with an engergized line, use a rope/line to remove the line from the suspended climber. I can see the need for removing the climber from contact with an energized line, but I'm not sure I want to be in contact with either the line or the climber while doing so. Granted, it's a tough rescue any way you go about it.
2. Non-energized, unconscious, suspended climber. The video suggests an unsecured footlock up the tail, click into the D's with your lanyard and work the fiction hitch down. With the AR requirement at a minimum of 40 ft, that seems like a long unsecured footlock. I don't suppose it would have to be unsecured, but that's a technique endorsed by the TCIA.
Please Advise,
BAB
I was studying for the ISA TW/CC cert with an EHAP/AR program from TCIA. The video suggests 2 techniques for AR that don't seem like good ideas to me.
1. If a climber is in contact with an engergized line, use a rope/line to remove the line from the suspended climber. I can see the need for removing the climber from contact with an energized line, but I'm not sure I want to be in contact with either the line or the climber while doing so. Granted, it's a tough rescue any way you go about it.
2. Non-energized, unconscious, suspended climber. The video suggests an unsecured footlock up the tail, click into the D's with your lanyard and work the fiction hitch down. With the AR requirement at a minimum of 40 ft, that seems like a long unsecured footlock. I don't suppose it would have to be unsecured, but that's a technique endorsed by the TCIA.
Please Advise,
BAB