That's not quite right. A barometric damper is used most times to automatically maintain a constant draft. A key/pipe damper is restricting draft all of the time, unless it is set wide open. My baro is closed 90% of the time, but when the wind blows it opens & prevents overdraft. Set it & forget it.
I said a flue damper
can be used in place of a barometric damper... I didn't say it was automatic.
I also said,
"The performance of any stove may be improved with a flue damper"... I didn't guarantee it would improve every setup... I even finished that with,
"but you'll never know if ya' don't try it." I understand the
"set it & forget it" thing... I'm all about that... but unless the rest of your setup is "set 'n' forget" you ain't gained sour owl crap in that department. My bet is the air adjustments you make far outnumber any you'd make to the flue damper... especially since
you say the baro don't do anything 90% of the time.
So you're sayin' a flue damper couldn't be used on windy days with
your setup?? And, just because
your baro is closed 90% of the time in no way means mine would be. For you to say,
"That's not quite right" based on just one setup (
yours) is not an objective statement... it's a subjective statement. I just gotta' ask... if you haven't tried a flue damper with your
current setup, how can you possibly know it wouldn't improve the overall performance verses the baro?? Seriously... how can you possibly know??
I didn't make any statement of "absoluteness"... but yours is. That's something that happens quite often on this board... such as the statements that that (all) modern stoves don't need, or will see no added benefit from a flue damper. The
"half the wood, twice the heat" thing is another one. The list goes on and on... Unfortunately too many are just regurgitation of the propaganda... or simply subjectively based in the need, or desire to believe in the magic. It really is a disservice to anyone comin' here lookin' for information... there ain't no right way/wrong way... there ain't no across-the-board absolutes... there ain't no one "size fits all"... and there sure-as-hell ain't no friggin' magic.
A flue damper gives you instantaneous, variable control of the draft... for just one example, if you want higher draft to get a fire started quickly, you open the damper for a couple minutes. Are there drawbacks?? Sure there are... just as there are drawbacks to a baro. Personally, the drawbacks of a baro introducing cooler air into the flue and sucking more air from the room (even 10% of the time) is not something I'm comfortable with. And to use your justification... 90% of the time my flue damper isn't touched.
If a barometric damper is what you like, then that's what you should have... it's
your setup.
If a baro works a certain way with
your setup, that great... but that's
your setup.
None of that negates anything I've posted... which is,
"a flue damper can be used in place of a barometric damper" and
"The performance of any stove may be improved with a flue damper" and "
A flue damper, used correctly, actually does a better job than a barometric damper because it keeps more heat in the box and doesn't cool the flue gasses."
What part of those statements are
"not quite right"??
*