Our wood stove is small...a Vermont Castings Resolute, but it heats our small home very well. Because it's small, I tend to split the firewood kind of small...personal preference.
I've wondered, though, if this makes a difference overall.
Hypothetical situation...all logs are 16" in length, same age, etc. If I split a 12"x12"x16" (rectangular) log into four 6"x6"x16" rectangular logs vs. sixteen 3"x3"x16" rectangular logs, overall, what difference would it make, burn-wise?
I'm thinking that if I wanted to get a fire going faster, the 3x3's would do that. If I wanted a slower burn, the 6x6's would do that.
But, if I didn't care about any of those things, doesn't it all come down to BTU output? A stove full of 3x3's would burn hotter, producing more BTU's for a shorter duration than a stove full of 6x6's.
In the end, let's say that I burned twelve of the 6x6's, or forty eight of the 3x3's (so, same volume of wood..).
Without changing any of the stove's adjustments, would there be a total BTU difference between the different size cuts?
Just curious, that's all....
Rich
I've wondered, though, if this makes a difference overall.
Hypothetical situation...all logs are 16" in length, same age, etc. If I split a 12"x12"x16" (rectangular) log into four 6"x6"x16" rectangular logs vs. sixteen 3"x3"x16" rectangular logs, overall, what difference would it make, burn-wise?
I'm thinking that if I wanted to get a fire going faster, the 3x3's would do that. If I wanted a slower burn, the 6x6's would do that.
But, if I didn't care about any of those things, doesn't it all come down to BTU output? A stove full of 3x3's would burn hotter, producing more BTU's for a shorter duration than a stove full of 6x6's.
In the end, let's say that I burned twelve of the 6x6's, or forty eight of the 3x3's (so, same volume of wood..).
Without changing any of the stove's adjustments, would there be a total BTU difference between the different size cuts?
Just curious, that's all....
Rich