nnero
ArboristSite Guru
I'm not downplaying the amount of information and knowledge he has. It's impressive. His responses in this thread do not reflect that however and there are more constructive ways to state ones opinion.
We get it. You like Husqvarna and only Husqvarna. Bulky this, clumsy that, ugly here and sideways balance there. ....
Those things actually are important, and the main reason I mostly prefere Husky saws.
If you want to sacrifice handling, power to weight etc for a lower price, it is totally up to you.
6100-$525
That 620P for $589 is a deal!
I love how sawTROLL ignores what people who have actually used the saws in question have to say. I think the 562 is butt ugly. So what? It has nothing to do with how it operates. He has added nothing of value to this thread.
your killin' me NikoSounds like a pest or colara question to me?
Filters. Looks like Dolmar has it here. View attachment 399657 View attachment 399658
Just blocking logs in the yard is one whing, how well the saws handle in the woods are much more important.What handles good in your mind isn't what matters. Firewood guys don't care about sideways balance. Most of them won't be cutting a fir, or pine variety. I'd rather use a 044 than a 562xp. How does that work out? It's the type of wood I cut. I could care less about sideways balance. Especially when bucking firewood. I find these "bulky" saws handle just fine when put on the log and buck up rounds.
Just blocking logs in the yard is one whing, how well the saws handel in the woods are much more important.
If you haven't used the saws in question your input is an opinion. With no real world knowledge none of what you said of the quality of design or handling carries anything more than a fan boy tone.
One thing I dislike about my 346xp. I like cover mounted tensioners also.
Isn't the carb not adjustable on the dolmar. I was going to get one until I heard that on here.