Rocky,
The most recent message came from the host at 24.62.183.126, that is unequivocal. The "sender" envelope header on the SMTP level indicated it was sent by "
[email protected]". The rfc822 "From:" header indicated "
[email protected]" sent it. The former would normally be a more authoritative source, but both can easily be faked (especially the latter).
How do you get db or "stihl magnum" out of either of those addresses? I don't, but maybe you can enlighten me. In fact I wish you would, as it seems as though my running unix servers live on the internet has left me "stupid" about this kind of stuff (you did accuse me of being so, right?).
Neither of my Internet Service Provider providers[sic] knows anything about the email address I use here. There's only one computer on the internet that acts as a mail relay and which knows anything about it, and I might ultimately be wrong, but I'd say it isn't harvestable from there. This particular critter thrives only on vulnerabilities built into stock MS-Windows boxes. Antivirus protection only <i>is</i> protection if it can load before any other code on the computer, can not be gotten under while running, and especially, is omniscient. Probably none of those pertain to anything readily available, but having something fairly current is better than nothing if one has to use MS "stuff" in other than a lab environment.
There are subtle differences between viruses and worms. This particular example is actually a bit of both. If you want to take this private I'd be glad to compare notes with you regarding some of the concepts involved.
I don't know why we always butt heads, Brian, but it sure seems to happen, doesn't it?
Glen