We have an ongoing discussion here at home what is best to buy.
Pricing is not the issue as it is very clear. The branches delivered in 1 meter pieces are about 1/3 more expensive just because they have to drive 4 times up and down versus the log truck once for the same amount.
My question relates to heat output and work to process the wood.
What is heating better / longer / cleaner: split logs or branches of which half is split also? any benefits burning one or the other?
Secondly the amount of work.
This is a 1 man operation, splitting by hand.
Logs: 18" and bigger, branches less than 12" all hardwood
Both are delivered next to the woodpile, so handling is anyway a minimum.
Cutting up the branches is a lot of bending and moving the cut pieces to be able to reach the non cut pieces.
Cutting up a logs is easier, flat ground and reachable from all sides etc.
Splitting the branches is again picking up and moving around. Splitting a round is probably harder but the round lays where it is split and you only have to pile the split pieces.
With my chainsaw addiction i like the idea more to buck some nice big logs versus the "stupidly small" branches. My internal manhood feelings also see it more "manly" splitting big rounds with a big sledgehammer.
But... the GF, who knows me better that myself, is insisting on the fact that i will not be able to handle the logs....
A sidenote is also the future plan to build a splitter. There I see a significant difference in my thinking between a splitter for branches (would be horizontal at standing work height - table) versus a log-round splitter which I would make vertical attached to a mini-tractor which drives to the rounds and grabs them.
Gas is going down 15% start of next year and wood prices will be falling. So i plan on making some reserve stock as guaranteed the gas distributor will find a reason to go up by at least 20% just before next winter...
All input welcome..
Pricing is not the issue as it is very clear. The branches delivered in 1 meter pieces are about 1/3 more expensive just because they have to drive 4 times up and down versus the log truck once for the same amount.
My question relates to heat output and work to process the wood.
What is heating better / longer / cleaner: split logs or branches of which half is split also? any benefits burning one or the other?
Secondly the amount of work.
This is a 1 man operation, splitting by hand.
Logs: 18" and bigger, branches less than 12" all hardwood
Both are delivered next to the woodpile, so handling is anyway a minimum.
Cutting up the branches is a lot of bending and moving the cut pieces to be able to reach the non cut pieces.
Cutting up a logs is easier, flat ground and reachable from all sides etc.
Splitting the branches is again picking up and moving around. Splitting a round is probably harder but the round lays where it is split and you only have to pile the split pieces.
With my chainsaw addiction i like the idea more to buck some nice big logs versus the "stupidly small" branches. My internal manhood feelings also see it more "manly" splitting big rounds with a big sledgehammer.
But... the GF, who knows me better that myself, is insisting on the fact that i will not be able to handle the logs....
A sidenote is also the future plan to build a splitter. There I see a significant difference in my thinking between a splitter for branches (would be horizontal at standing work height - table) versus a log-round splitter which I would make vertical attached to a mini-tractor which drives to the rounds and grabs them.
Gas is going down 15% start of next year and wood prices will be falling. So i plan on making some reserve stock as guaranteed the gas distributor will find a reason to go up by at least 20% just before next winter...
All input welcome..