french prusik

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Looks like your running that setup on a rope bridge. I think the separation your refering to has to do with the termination (eye of your climbing line) is clipped into your biner right next to your friction hitch...? I can see that being a pain in the buttocks.

Thats one of the reasons I like my old 4-Dee Buckingham Wide-Back. On the bridge I've got 2 Dees which keep the termination and the hitch pretty well seperate, eliminating that problem in all but the most precarious positions while climbing. Yeah, I know my saddle is old and uncool, but I love it.

Not having a rope bridge, and not climbing on that setup (other than using the VT) I guess I am just jacking my jaw here. I dont see how there can be any separation when your terminating your line to the same point that your hitch is attached. But, I've been wrong before!

Works great on the versatile saddle
 
i usually think in terms of Uninterrupted Turns 1,2,3,4,7 : single Turn, Round Turn, Double Round Turn, Coil, Fr. Prussik. Kinda a collection of others; mostly from knudeNoggin(knot head) pointing stuff out written for ages. but, who knows what the 'legal' name/ construction (if such a thing i the knot wierld) is. As pointed out the crossing would put this lacing outside of most 'definitions' of a French Prusik i think.

The 3/8 Tenex is hollow, easier to splice; then is well whipped' on ends. Also, being flat in the friction hitch, Tenex will be wider than round 3/8. But, this gives more surface contact area. For same you would need thicker round line; that would be too much leveraged around such a tight bight as the host climbing line- and probably not seat right to boot! So, the Tenex by laying flat, is also not leveraged by virtue of less leverageable 'height' on the deformed axis(outside/working part of line that is forced in tight arc; doesn't sit as high off host life line).

So, seats and grabs better; with less strength loss i think!

Now, i think the VT in action is mechanically different, the braids around the lifeline buffer the loading to the fuller stop power of the uninterrupted Turns; by bending the lifeline below the Turns. A series of 5-7 Uninterrupted Turns; would be a different kind of 'sock' grabbing at the lifeline. Likewise, a knot that is allowed to invert or alter can alter it's mechanics; and even enough to go from good to something not near equivalent!
 
Last edited:
ive used this not for years. but when i worked for bartlett it was considered unsafe and we were not supposed to use it.
 
ive used this not for years. but when i worked for bartlett it was considered unsafe and we were not supposed to use it.

It is a good knot, and strong. I have never used it for climbing, but pretty much anything else. It may look somewhat unsafe, due to the way it is wrapped.. but I have never seen one fail under load.
 
Is this knot truly a French Prusik?

attachment.php

We called it the Outagamie..... why you may ask..........why not.
 
We called it the Outagamie..... why you may ask..........why not.

Thats a good one did you come up with that yourself? you should make defintion for that in the urban dictionary.:bringit:
 
We named it that because it is the county that we live in.... real original right?
 
My second attempt at a locking brummel eye and eye splice, bought some tenex and found a samson splicing diagram and some threads on AS. Learned quite a bit after trying it for the first time. Second time it came out much more consistently tapered. I have to say it's pretty easy. I still need to lock the splice with stitching. Gonna save me some money.

attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php
 

Latest posts

Back
Top