Aviacs
ArboristSite Lurker
Aviacs, you state: "there is no such thing as lead-free avgas".
Then what is G100UL, or UL94 ?
Good for you!
I've seen a few reports, G100UL was only announced this summer.
But to most of us, it is mythical stuff.
It does appear there is some availability for UL94 in California.
I'd be happy to see it spread everywhere - Swift's website shows graphics of how bad leaded is for most of our engines, not to mention the rest of us healthwise.
Here's another point - It's not yet clear that most of us can legally just call up the fuel truck and request UL. The FAA appears to be issuing the STC's (paperwork) on a type-by-type airframe and engine basis. It could be a few years before everyone is in. (To be clear, no one really checks what you put in your tanks. But it can be an insurance factor for even a minor accident, or an added issue for an enforcement action for some other cause) As mentioned my first post, we who run 93 unleaded mogas have to buy an STC saying we can if we want to. The STC cost/license fee pays whoever did all the testing and jumped through all the hoops to prove to the FAA that whatever is safe in every imaginable scenario.
That said, i fail to see how it will benefit chainsaws over unleaded mogas.
As a flying club, we will probably continue to seek out 93 unleaded mogas based on price comparison, and it is what i will run im my airplane unless the av-specific fuel is cheaper. Thanks for bringing it to my attention that the option may soon be available in some places that decide to put in another set of pumps. At some point, no doubt, leaded will be phased out, and none too soon. The "meantime" however, for most of us, will probably be a few years or more.
smt