beowulf343
Addicted to ArboristSite
That extra hour or two of me in the tree knocking down a few more chunks is a lot less expensive to my employer than replacing a deck, fence, greenhouse, etc. So far, no major damage (he did break some terra-cotta pots when the stub bounced more than he thought), but I feel like it's just a matter of odds, and why play those odds when you don't have to... Oh, and just to remove confusion, I'm talking about hitting a line where you only have 2-3 feet of error with a 30-50 foot piece. So now that I've rambled on, I would like everyone else's 2 cents, am I out of line thinking that this kind of risk is unnacceptable?
That extra hour or two can add up to a couple more tree jobs by the end of the week. But to be honest, if you've been dropping stems in tight areas every day for years, you've learned how to minimize the risk. I'll drop the biggest stems i can get away with. You do residential takedowns for a living and you learn that 2-3 feet of error is a lot. Too many of mine come down in a spot with alot less room for error than that.
I actually broke a couple pots last summer too. Stem hit the ground, shook the deck, and they fell off the railing.