My previous post in this thread almost had a different form and subject entirely, but I thought it through a little. I was going to guess a Fales in an inappropriate way.
That being said, just because there's an outside chance the guy in the picture <i>might</i> be related to Thomas Junior lends no unearned credibility to any of the subsequent family tree. In fact that might be a good thing for the progeny since the guy in the photo needed supervision just to buck a log.
Glen
[okay, so I hate to make or see edited posts... My only changes are down here inside the brackets. I really, <i>really</i> forgot the "LOL" after that last sentence. It was/is supposed to be there.]