clearance
Addicted to ArboristSite
Bruce, I started this thread, back in 2005. I feel that each to his own. I have never used a machine, I always file by hand. And I have taken a good look at my chains, and my bars. They look even and balanced. I have been a r.o.w. slasher, a spacer, a bucker and a climber/tree service guy. Gavin is a production faller.
I have sharpened about 99% of the time in the field, but I also have a big vise with a bright light shining on it. By hand and eye I can do it pretty good, better than out of the box, thats for sure. I have never chucked a chain that had some life left in it, I only chuck bars when they are bent.
Think about this, a machine cannot put the double hook into a tooth, you can only do that by hand, with practice. (I mean a hook as you look straight down on the chain, like the hook when you are looking sideways, this is for clean wood, works great) So it could be that a machine done chain may be more balanced, angled perfectly, but not cut as fast as a hand filed chain, by a guy who has ran saw for thousands of hours. Rakers are another matter, we are talking the blondest of c-hairs, doesn't hurt to use a gauge here for optimal performance once in while.
I have sharpened about 99% of the time in the field, but I also have a big vise with a bright light shining on it. By hand and eye I can do it pretty good, better than out of the box, thats for sure. I have never chucked a chain that had some life left in it, I only chuck bars when they are bent.
Think about this, a machine cannot put the double hook into a tooth, you can only do that by hand, with practice. (I mean a hook as you look straight down on the chain, like the hook when you are looking sideways, this is for clean wood, works great) So it could be that a machine done chain may be more balanced, angled perfectly, but not cut as fast as a hand filed chain, by a guy who has ran saw for thousands of hours. Rakers are another matter, we are talking the blondest of c-hairs, doesn't hurt to use a gauge here for optimal performance once in while.