Here is some interesting information on firewood and what takes place as we heat with wood.
www.mha-net.org/docs/v8n2/docs/WDBASICS.pdf
www.mha-net.org/docs/v8n2/docs/WDBASICS.pdf
No one cares about btu/lb because our wood burning appliances are limited by volume not be weight... However, it's interesting to look at the numbers.
No one cares about btu/lb because our wood burning appliances are limited by volume not be weight... However, it's interesting to look at the numbers.
IMO, no one cares about btu/lb. Amount of fuel going into the stove is limited by volume not weight...So since volume is limited, all the better to try to use wood that has more pounds (i.e. btu) per volume. So btu/lb could actually be something a lot of people might care about.
IMO, no one cares about btu/lb. Amount of fuel going into the stove is limited by volume not weight...
Answer these questions for me...
1. What is the maximum lbs of firewood you can load into your firebox?
2. What's the maximum volume of firewood you can load into your firebox?
IMO, no one cares about btu/lb. Amount of fuel going into the stove is limited by volume not weight...
Answer these questions for me...
1. What is the maximum lbs of firewood you can load into your firebox?
2. What's the maximum volume of firewood you can load into your firebox?
One more:
3. Is it necessary to load your firebox to it's maximum capacity each loading?
Most people that burn wood are limited to the kind of trees in their area, Some have plenty of oak and some have only softwoods to burn. Doesn't matter what you get per pound because you burn what you have. Some just have to burn more than others, but at the end of the burning season we all stayed warm with the heat.
No but my point is people typically want to use the most power dense fuel they can get and power density is a function of volume. I can't open your file but I believe the btu/lb in popular is higher than most would assume but its not as good of a fuel source because it's low power density. IIRC it requires nearly 3 times the volume as quality hard wood.
On average, greater than 50% of the time my stove is filled 90% or greater. The other 50% of the time my wife throws a few cunks in it through the day to maintain the house. And on really cold days I bet she fills it close to 90%.One more:
3. Is it necessary to load your firebox to it's maximum capacity each loading?
I was going from memory, the number is something less than 3x... I might of been thinking btu/ft^3, 3 times the volumeActually 3X is not correct. There is a lot of myth surrounding this subject.
The density of poplar is about 30lbs pre cu. ft.
Red oak is about 44lbs. per cu. ft.
White Oak is 47lbs. per cu. ft.
You can't just compare btu/lb, if you want to compare apples to apples then you need to compare volume. If your heat load requires 100,000 btu then you are going to want to figure out how much volume of wood you need to achieve that heat requirement.
Can you give me a practical use for knowing btu/lb?
Well sure they all burn and give off heat. It all depends on how often you want to load your stove. When I'm out scrounging or have to buy wood I know energy/volume is King. I'll happily walk over pine or popple to cut some ash because if the volume of those two species is 2x that of ash or cherry then I know I'm bring home twice the heat in a single truck load as compared to the popple or pine.Yes.
Btu per pound is almost the same across all wood species.
The practical use for knowing this is understanding that almost all species are good for use as fuel.
Well sure they all burn and give off heat. It all depends on how often you want to load your stove. When I'm out scrounging or have to buy wood I know energy/volume is King. I'll happily walk over pine(around 15 million btu per cord) or popple to cut some ash(around 20million btu per cord) because if the volume of those two species is 2x that of ash or cherry(around 20million btu per cord) then I know I'm bring home twice the heat in a single truck load as compared to the popple or pine.
Was just going to say something like this.No but my point is people typically want to use the most power dense fuel they can get and power density is a function of volume. I can't open your file but I believe the btu/lb in popular is higher than most would assume but its not as good of a fuel source because it's low power density. IIRC it requires nearly 3 times the volume as quality hard wood.
Was just going to say something like this.
Birch/maple will burn 2-3 times as long in my boiler despite being only 45% more dense than aspen.