You mean newer 50cc saw, yes?No 50cc saw has alot of torque in the cut.
You mean newer 50cc saw, yes?No 50cc saw has alot of torque in the cut.
No 50cc saw has alot of torque in the cutSometimes it isnt about the quickest cut.
Lot of 346 stuff NLA anymore like their pushing us away to the newer.
Mainly want to feel the torque in the cut over a cut time honestly. Not in any races anymore. Wood dont care I dont care if a second or 2 slower.
The lighter weight of 501 is noticed.
If anything the newer ones have more. Some of the old ones like the MS260/026 had very little. The 346XP even the OE was much better., but still not as good as a 550xp mk2.You mean newer 50cc saw, yes?
I was thinking the old macs and homelitesNo 50cc saw has alot of torque in the cut
If anything the newer ones have more. Some of the old ones like the MS260/026 had very little. The 346XP even the OE was much better., but still not as good as a 550xp mk2.
And cut slow as hell.I was thinking the old macs and homelites
So?And cut slow as hell.
The point of it all is to cut as efficiently as possible is it not? Or is it a flex to have a saw you can dog in with all your weight, but cuts slow enough to be timed with a sun dial?So?
If you want torque you're probably not aiming for speed.
For falling, it's more speed than torque, especially for safety of more quickly severing the fibers.
I have to disagree with you.The point of it all is to cut as efficiently as possible is it not? Or is it a flex to have a saw you can dog in with all your weight, but cuts slow enough to be timed with a sun dial?
Its also worth noting that guys misconstrue what torque is. These often will say a slower saw has more torque than a faster saw when that's not the case. A ms260 vs a 346xp is a prime example. People will swear up and down that the 260 has more torque. It does not and it's not close. It's just slower and has a choked up exhaust note because the porting design is terrible.
Back when those old homies and macs where being used in the woods a logger would chuck them in the trash if he had access to a modern saw. No matter if he were a faller or a firewood guy.So?
If you want torque you're probably not aiming for speed.
For falling, it's more speed than torque, especially for safety of more quickly severing the fibers.
A couple thoughts. Your time must be worth less to you and an electric saw sounds pretty gay to me. But whatever floats your boat.I have to disagree with you.
I buck.most of my personal firewood (2.5-3 cords per year) with a battery saw(540i) specifically to not use gasoline or spend the money on gasoline. I don't give two licks if it's 15+% slower. Even in 20" wood.
Gay?A couple thoughts. Your time must be worth less to you and an electric saw sounds pretty gay to me. But whatever floats your boat.
I said " what ever floats your boat".Gay?
You have something against homosexuals too??
You seem to be quite the predjudiced-prick from our limited interactions
You clearly have an agenda here, so I'll leave you to it.I said " what ever floats your boat".
But you won't convince me that being gay is manly and that's just nature and genetics at play.
That is a kind way to put it HumBurner but is 100% true. walker is a key board hero in his own mind.You seem to be quite the predjudiced-prick from our limited interactions
No disagreement there.
So how do you feel about the Makita 50cc saw (s). They still can be had new in the box. Your thread here is two non strato closed port saws. Seems the Makita one and some earlier grey market Stihl ones fall in this category.I just prefer simple old school to work on with regular carbs saws myself.
Enter your email address to join: