Husky 455 vs 353

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Timberpig got it right, and coveredinsap got it wrong.

... simple as that!

Uh, not so "simple". I'd suggest you check your precious Stihl's for those 'magnesium cases' you rave about....as they appear to be on the way out to make room for new technology, i.e. composite cases with metal lining....exactly what is purportedly on the 455.
 
coveredinsap said:
Uh, not so "simple". I'd suggest you check your precious Stihl's for those 'magnesium cases' you rave about....as they appear to be on the way out to make room for new technology, i.e. composite cases with metal lining....exactly what is purportedly on the 455.


Simply wrong again...
 
Composite cases are not found on any professional saws.

And how do you know that for a fact?

By the way, the 455 Rancher has a manually adjustable chain oiler contrary to the specs/catalog. There is a multiposition set screw on the underneath of the saw, and instructions for setting it are on page 35 of the (english) manual. Surprise, surprise.
 
coveredinsap said:
And how do you know that for a fact?

By the way, the 455 Rancher has a manually adjustable chain oiler contrary to the specs/catalog. There is a multiposition set screw on the underneath of the saw, and instructions for setting it are on page 35 of the (english) manual. Surprise, surprise.
Simple--being a professional saw precludes the use of composite crankcases. Similarly, if I said no midget weighs 400 lbs., would you ask me how I know this for a fact? :rolleyes:
 
coveredinsap said:
.... precious Stihl's for those 'magnesium cases' you rave about ...
Stihl are generally no more precious to me than Husqvarna is, and I am not raving about anything ...
Both Husky and Stihl make some outstanding, some very good, some good, and some not-so-good models.

Stihl has saw models with about the same weight handicap as the 455 has, and for the same reason - they try to make saws that are a bit stronger than the typical homeowner saw, but as they do it with plastic cases, the cases and saws turn into heavy and bulky ones. :cry:

Magnesium is just stronger than plastic, related to both weight and bulk.
 
Last edited:
Simple--being a professional saw precludes the use of composite crankcases. Similarly, if I said no midget weighs 400 lbs., would you ask me how I know this for a fact?

No, I'd say you have no idea of what you speak. Here's a midget that weighs plenty more. Notice the curb weight....1631 lbs.

http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=63668&MG#specs

Or do you mean exactly 400 lbs?

And there's plenty more where that came from.
 
coveredinsap said:
And how do you know that for a fact?

By the way, the 455 Rancher has a manually adjustable chain oiler contrary to the specs/catalog. There is a multiposition set screw on the underneath of the saw, and instructions for setting it are on page 35 of the (english) manual. Surprise, surprise.


And so did my Non-pro dolmar from 1987. Big deal welcome to 1990. The 455 is not and will not be a pro model. Drop it already. I have a good running 55 and wouldn't take the time to throw it at your 455. Just wait until you drop that off a tailgate, porch, workbench etc. The local husky dealers loves them for the repair work he gets on swapping a plastic case. You say composite, but the truth hurts sometimes. Plastic is plastic. BTW, got a good running 290, that should be right up your alley. You interested? :laugh:
 
The local husky dealers loves them for the repair work he gets on swapping a plastic case. You say composite, but the truth hurts sometimes. Plastic is plastic. BTW, got a good running 290, that should be right up your alley. You interested?

LOL! At your age I'll forgive you for not knowing what real 'plastic' is.

As for the 290... I'm looking for something to one day replace my Poulan thrasher saw..but, naw, that 290 probably can't handle it.
 
coveredinsap said:
And how do you know that for a fact?

By the way, the 455 Rancher has a manually adjustable chain oiler contrary to the specs/catalog. There is a multiposition set screw on the underneath of the saw, and instructions for setting it are on page 35 of the (english) manual. Surprise, surprise.

In term of the 455, what has the adjustable oiler got to do with it? Certainly not a unique indicator of a pro saw.

Why don't you insert some "facts' instead of generalizations? Earlier in this thread you were arguing that pro and homeowner saws were the same inside. sure...

To answer your original question : How do we know? For a start - maybe we work in the business... have seen pretty much all models, and now and then, a peek at the "future models".
 
I think the bottom line here is, the 455 for the money isn't a bad saw, yeah it's a little heavy(if you're gonna complain about a few lbs than you probably shouldn't be running saws anyhow) and when used for what it is intented to be used for will work as well as any saw in it's class , now as far as this whole post goes I have not seen one person actually compare it to the 353 which was the original post that was started and the reason I read through all this bs in the first place as I was interested in buying a new saw and these were some of the choices for me
thank you
Ryan
 
In term of the 455, what has the adjustable oiler got to do with it? Certainly not a unique indicator of a pro saw.

I never said it was any kind of 'indicator'. The point was that the specs say the oiler is not adjustable. That appears to be an error, it is adjustable.

now as far as this whole post goes I have not seen one person actually compare it to the 353 which was the original post that was started and the reason I read through all this bs in the first place as I was interested in buying a new saw and these were some of the choices for me

The 353 is a .325 pitch chain, The 455 is 3/8 (.325 optional).
The 353 is E-TECH engine. The 455 is X_TORQ engine.
The 353 has a quick release air filter cover. The 455 requires the scrench/screwdriver.
The 353 is a 'professional' model. The 455 is 'semi-pro'/farm model.

That's about it. Around here a lot of folks think that you need to buy a 'professional' grade saw, and that magically transforms you into a 'professional'. You don't, and it doesn't.

I hope that helps.
 
Rspike said:
Just looking around at a few saws and doing some reading & research when i ended up getting a new Husqvarna 359. QUOTE]
Sry to break up the nice discusion that thier are aperently 4 pages of..
Rspike.. what do YOU think of your new 359? do you think you made a good investment?
I just recently purchased a 51. used of course but new ring and piston and some other new stuff.. i payed abit more then i wanted to for this saw.. but i think i made a good investment
 
Well I just used my friends 455, and it is not too bad. I am normally a Stihl man, but the 455 did well. I do not see what all the fuss is about. I think it is a good saw for the money.
 
coveredinsap said:
The 353 is E-TECH engine. ....
The E-tech is an option, most of them don't have it - at least not over here....

I have never seen a either Husky or a Jonsered chainsaw with E-tech.
 
Last edited:
coveredinsap said:
I'm sorry to have to tell you this, but....simply buying/using/owning a 'pro' saw doesn't make you a 'big boy', or any better than anyone else.

And no, they're not any 'lesser' or 'substandard' than a professional race car is to a ordinary 'homeowner' vehicle. Just different is all.


I agree.

I found this forum while conducting research for my first chain saw. There is a lot of good information but you've got to wade through the crap as well.

I needed a saw to trim and/or cut up a few trees a couple of times per year for my mom. Her home sits of two wooded acres.

I was considering the 353, the 359, and the 455 Rancher. I did not want a $150 El Cheapo budget saw and I did not NEED a "pro" saw. I went with the 455 with a 20" bar with the low kickback chain. I didn't want to make the front page of the local paper the day after I purchased my first saw.

The 359 ran a hundred bucks more than the 455. I know all the stuff about "You get what you pay for." I figured that the 455 was good enough for my needs and I didn't really need the pro saw for bragging rights.

Of course, the 455 is a LOT heavier than the 353 by 11.2 ounces. What the hell? It's not like you are comparing a saw the weighs 16 pounds to one that weighs 10. There is NOT a significant difference in weight between the two saws.

I dropped $1400 for summer dockage last month, my family and I spent a week out of town on vacation two weeks ago, and I've got to have the gimble rings and boots replaced on my boat (twin 350 IO's) That job is gonna cost a chunk of change. I "saved" a hundred bucks by going with the 455.

If I were going to quit my job to be a lumberjack or cut firewood for a living I would probably run out and buy a pro saw. Simply dropping another $100 on a saw was not going to make ME a pro.

It's amusing when you see posters slam each other for their choice of chainsaws. How many of these guys run a saw for a living? I don't think that Sven the lumberjack is sitting at his computer slamming Joe Homeowner for buying a non-pro saw.

It's like Ford vs. Chevy, 30.06 Remington vs. .270 Winchester, .45 vs. 9mm, etc.

My Dad had either a Homelite or a McCulough. It was hard to start and the chain came off every now and then. He's gone now and it's my responsibility to do the big yard work for my mom.

The 455 started without a hitch. You don't even have to push the little gizmo that makes it easier to yank the starter cord (unless you're tired from lugging around those extra 11.2 ounces). I chopped down and cut up (not pro lingo) an old 16 " diameter apple tree. I trimmed maple trees and chopped up an old choke cherry tree. The saw did the work, not me.

The 455 Rancher has some balls. Buy one and you'll be happy.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top