I believe there are weight discrepancies between the individual models also. I weighed the 592 I had and a 2188 was 3 ounces lighter.
I believe there are weight discrepancies between the individual models also. I weighed the 592 I had and a 2188 was 3 ounces lighter.
I blew up 3 of em and they quit starting. Just didn't have good luck with em I guess.what was garbage about the 572? I have been considering one to go along with my 592.
IMy 394 does have more low end torque
If the scale is zeroed it for each saw it won't matter much which surface it's on. Plus we arent talking rocket surgery here..
How does one go about operating on a rocket?I
If the scale is zeroed it for each saw it won't matter much which surface it's on. Plus we arent talking rocket surgery here..
When it comes to comparing chainsaw weights guess it does not really matter.
haven't been on here in monthsThe issue with these samplings is there no consistency in the method of weighing other than using the same scale, the 592 the scale is balancing on what looks like a pickup bed liner and the saw is positioned over one corner of the scale and not centered. The heaviest saw is the 395 which is the only saw that looks like it might be centered on the beam/platform of the scale. Score A for effort C for execution.
Enter your email address to join: