That is not the case with the cheap Huztl kits.Goes like this:
Stihl contracts with a company to make 100,000 widgets.
Company makes 150,000 widgets and delivers 100,000 to Stihl.
Markets the 50,000 to whoever is interested.
[emoji108]
That is not the case with the cheap Huztl kits.Goes like this:
Stihl contracts with a company to make 100,000 widgets.
Company makes 150,000 widgets and delivers 100,000 to Stihl.
Markets the 50,000 to whoever is interested.
[emoji108]
I think Brads correct. I think Huztl never had anything to do with the original manufacture of the saws. They just straight up cloned them and ripped off the design.That is not the case with the cheap Huztl kits.
Ah i thought this was the case. Quality wise, they are not even from the same planet! LolIt's a fact that Huztl and OEM are not from the same factories!
...and probably makes 50,000 more later on..Goes like this:
Stihl contracts with a company to make 100,000 widgets.
Company makes 150,000 widgets and delivers 100,000 to Stihl.
Markets the 50,000 to whoever is interested.
[emoji108]
Its also the quality of the fitment of the metal parts, the quality of the bearings and seals, piston to cylinder size/fit, cylinder plating quality, switch and electrics, small bits like throttle pushrod bend, starter rope strength.The biggest difference is the quality of the steel. That's the huge difference I have found is that the Hutzl steel is soft where OEM is tough. I worked in a steel plant for 10 years. Great steel has MANY ingredients, whereas cheap steel doesn't.
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
The ongoing problem is the portion of Joe Public that the latest in whatever is a Must Havethe manufacturers will & who can blame them alter parts & introduce "Gizmo's in some cases not an improvementThe other way to look at it is that the big name manufacturers are selling saws at prices high enough that they've opened up an opportunity for others to undercut them and take their market. They probably don't have a choice, as I'd bet their operating costs are quite high too.
At the low end Husky has the Poulan line, which are very inexpensive to make but sold at razor thin margins. Both Husky and Stihl have their own branded homeowner stuff that is hardly any different from the Poulans but sold at a premium. They're probably making most of their money on those lines.
At the high end there are sales of professional saws, but I'd bet a hefty portion of these go as luxury items - I'd like to know the split.
Big portions of both markets are likely to disappear in the next economic step down, when easy credit dries up and people cut back on purchases of things they don't need.
And what have the big names been spending the R&D on? The only significant developments recently have been strato and feedback carbs, which Husqvarna spent a ton on. But really fuel prices are not high enough for most to care about, and emissions rules are easy enough to meet by shoving on a cat and modifying the port timing. The Chinese clone manufacturers have that worked out. The rest of the R&D goes to competing for market share against each other, much like the never ending styling changes in cars. Sure they're better, but enough to matter? The rest of their overhead is in maintaining the sales channel, lots for advertising and marketing, and parts and service.
The Chinese can sell clones of the Zenoah G3800, G5000, and G621 with minor developments, along with something bigger, and meet the needs of most every saw market in the world. Their development costs would be very low. Apparently the other costs would be borne by local distributors/importers.
The only parts I know for sure that are made in China are their carburetors...I have a few here if anybody needs any proof. They came from the smaller clamshell saws but haven't seen the word "China" on any of their bigger ones, not saying there isn't however.
Having worked for a company whose products the chicom company's were breaking their neck's to get hold of a ll What they do is purchase a genuine product strip measure etc & then make copies & sell at a much lower price dependent on price is quality not the usual other way around even if told to stop production due to patents/trademarks they don't & never pay the copyright & other legal fines all you ended up with was greatly reduced sales & out of pocket fighting (money cos) with paying legal fees to no availI think Brads correct. I think Huztl never had anything to do with the original manufacture of the saws. They just straight up cloned them and ripped off the design.
I cant be 100% sure though
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Enter your email address to join: