Jomoco,
I run a 16" bar on my 200t and as soon as the wood is 16", I want some darn horsepower up in the tree.
Why would you struggle your way around a 28" chunk of spar with a tiny wee saw when some power and bar length will get it done faster, easier?
I'm all for improvements to the 200t, Stihl is, I believe, also listening.
It took a couple of years, but the gas tank compensation tube has now moved out of harms way. I still think the gap between the tank and carb cover at the back should be filled in, it stihl grabs twigs at annoying moments.
In fact the entire butt-end of the 200t could be less brick shaped, more rounded like the 192t would be very nice.
And where is the use of carbon fibre? A six-way layup instead of injection molded plastic of the top handle, chain brake lever and cover, and the top tube would be way strong and weigh about the same as a bag of potato chips.
CF's expensive, but it's a niche saw with a high price already. I'd pay more for a ms200t CF special!
RedlineIt