Goose IBEW
ArboristSite Operative
I'm not sure what a 22 year old pottymouth punk has to offer but I'm up for a good time......
LOL you know I am all over that .I'm not sure what a 22 year old pottymouth punk has to offer but I'm up for a good time......
Maybe we can get some strippers and light another car on fire ... Sounds fun rightCan't help myself sometimes, lol.
You shouldn't remove that secondary stem right now, it's too big and the tree wouldn't be able to compartmentalize it. What I would do is reduce the growing capability of the stem you want removed by subordinating it and thinning that stem by about 25-30%. Wait about 5 years and thin it again. After about the 3rd pruning cycle, the stem will now be small enough in relation to the dominant stem for it to be removed. You don't want to remove a subordinate stem or branch that is greater than a third the size of the retained stem. This strategy is based on Ed Gilman's book.