MCW
Somebody's talking crap here & it ain't the tree!
Ya but ya wont like the sideways balance.
The Dolmars and 390XP are inboard clutch too
Ya but ya wont like the sideways balance.
Glad to hear about Jacob. I hope he continues to improve.
Yes it is. I'm so relieved. I was pretty worried........my lack of faith still pops thru at times.
So when the AT version is released, how will it compare ported to the current 372 ported?
legally I have to deny the existence of the 572. :hmm3grin2orange: but ,I did have a saw with no name in my possession for a while.
I'm thinking it will be a 572 or something. I hope it's like a supersized 562XP.
Do you feel it performed as well or better than the original xpw?
(In aircraft, the runs of an alike version are called blocks. When a block is different enough they start another series letter. AH-64A, then AH-64D, then block III of the delta model became AH-64E)
It seems to me that like most things in life, there is a learning curve on porting any saw. It seems that there is also a learning curve on the engineers part in releasing the saw, and one in porting the saw and figuring out if the AT is pretty much the same as the previous "block II" AT or if they have moved further along the evolution of AT with the initial release of the 572.
So when the initial version of the 572 comes out, do I want to have mine be the first one ported, or do I wait around and see how the performance works out on someone elses saw being the first one? I assume the 572 will come in at a substantial price for starters. :msp_sad:
Do you feel it performed as well or better than the original xpw?
legally I don't have an opinion of this non existent saw. but I may have dreamed that it really liked it better than the xpw. but I was just dreaming im sure.
In your dream was it Red and Black?:msp_ohmy:
Enter your email address to join: